• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Evaluating the accuracy of data entry in a regional colorectal cancer database: implications for national audit.

作者信息

Kelly M, Lamah M

机构信息

Digestive Diseases Centre, Brighton, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2007 May;9(4):337-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01122.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01122.x
PMID:17432986
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy and completeness of data entry in a regional colorectal cancer database.

METHOD

Records were obtained for 50 patients selected at random from the database. A sample of 18 key data points (preoperative and operative) were selected from the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland colorectal cancer minimum dataset. Data were extracted from the case notes by a clinician and compared with database entries.

RESULTS

Overall 83% of data elements were present in the patient records. There was agreement between patient records and the database for 61% of data points overall, and for 70% of preoperative data and 47% of operative data.

CONCLUSION

The regional colorectal cancer database is inaccurate, particularly regarding operative data. Insufficient information in patient records accounts for a proportion of missing data, and lack of agreement between records and the database may be due to misinterpretation of records by nonclinical staff. The accuracy of regional data may be improved by weekly review of database entries and/or entry of clinical data by a clinician.

摘要

相似文献

1
Evaluating the accuracy of data entry in a regional colorectal cancer database: implications for national audit.
Colorectal Dis. 2007 May;9(4):337-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01122.x.
2
An audit of the Irish National Intellectual Disability Database.爱尔兰国家智力残疾数据库审计。
Res Dev Disabil. 2010 Mar-Apr;31(2):446-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.10.011. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
3
Comparison of administrative data with the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) colorectal cancer database.行政数据与英国及爱尔兰结直肠外科学会(ACPGBI)结直肠癌数据库的比较。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Feb;23(2):155-63. doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0390-z. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
4
Completeness of data entry in three cancer surgery databases.三个癌症手术数据库中数据录入的完整性。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002 Dec;28(8):850-6. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2002.1283.
5
Are unaudited records from an outcomes registry database accurate?来自结果登记数据库的未经审计的记录准确吗?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jun;77(6):1960-4; discussion 1964-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.12.018.
6
2008 Niday Perinatal Database quality audit: report of a quality assurance project.2008年尼代围产期数据库质量审计:一项质量保证项目的报告
Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2011 Dec;32(1):32-42.
7
Validation of the quality of The National Pain Database for pain management services in the United Kingdom.英国疼痛管理服务国家疼痛数据库的质量验证
Anaesthesia. 2008 Nov;63(11):1217-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05609.x.
8
Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain & Ireland (ACPGBI): Guidelines for the Management of Cancer of the Colon, Rectum and Anus (2017) - Audit and Outcome Reporting.英国及爱尔兰结直肠外科学会(ACPGBI):《结肠、直肠和肛管癌管理指南(2017年)》——审计与结果报告
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jul;19 Suppl 1:71-73. doi: 10.1111/codi.13707.
9
A critical evaluation of HIPE data.对HIPE数据的批判性评估。
Ir Med J. 2012 Jan;105(1):21-3.
10
Quality of data in the Manchester orthopaedic database.曼彻斯特骨科数据库中的数据质量。
BMJ. 1992 Jan 18;304(6820):159-62. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6820.159.

引用本文的文献

1
Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration.透明报告使用聚类数据开发或验证的多变量预测模型(TRIPOD-Cluster):解释和说明。
BMJ. 2023 Feb 7;380:e071058. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071058.
2
Does Surgeon Volume Impact Morbidity Following Parathyroidectomy? A Study of 16,140 Parathyroidectomies from the UK Registry of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgery (UKRETS) Database.外科医生的手术量会影响甲状旁腺切除术后的发病率吗?一项基于英国内分泌与甲状腺外科注册数据库(UKRETS)中16140例甲状旁腺切除术的研究。
World J Surg. 2023 May;47(5):1221-1230. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06863-9. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
3
The opportunities and shortcomings of using big data and national databases for sarcoma research.
利用大数据和国家数据库进行肉瘤研究的机遇和局限性。
Cancer. 2019 Sep 1;125(17):2926-2934. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32118. Epub 2019 May 15.
4
Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: a review of the fascial composition of the abdominal cavity.腹腔镜结肠癌手术:腹腔筋膜组成的综述
Surg Today. 2015 Feb;45(2):129-39. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-0857-9. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
5
Does practice make perfect?熟能生巧吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 May;15(5):1267-70. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9804-y. Epub 2008 Jan 29.