Suppr超能文献

通过两种分析策略,将伴放线聚集杆菌作为侵袭性牙周炎的指标。

Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans as indicator for aggressive periodontitis by two analysing strategies.

作者信息

Schacher Beate, Baron Frédéric, Rossberg Matthias, Wohlfeil Martin, Arndt Rita, Eickholz Peter

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Center of Dental, Oral, and Maxillofacial Medicine (Carolinum), Hospital of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Jul;34(7):566-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01080.x. Epub 2007 Apr 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the subgingival microbiota of aggressive and chronic periodontitis (ChP) using single-site and pooled plaque samples.

METHODS

In 60 patients with aggressive or ChP, subgingival plaque was sampled from the four deepest pockets using two sterile paper points simultaneously. One paper point from each pocket was put in a separate transport vial, the second was pooled with the three other paper points of a respective patient. The content of each vial was analysed for Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Tannerella forsythensis, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Treponema denticola.

RESULTS

Pooled plaque samples detected higher numbers for all tested pathogens than single-site samples. Detection frequencies were similar for both strategies. Using single-site samples, A. actinomycetemcomitans detection rate was statistically significantly a higher in aggressive than in ChP (p=0.01). A. actinomycetemcomitans was found in higher numbers, the other pathogens in lower numbers in aggressive than in ChP. Neither presence nor absence of one of the tested bacteria had sufficient positive or negative predictive value for aggressive periodontitis.

CONCLUSION

A. actinomycetemcomitans was detected in higher numbers and frequency in aggressive than in ChP. Its detection may confirm the clinical diagnosis and influence therapy. As a diagnostic test, its sensitivity and predictive value was low.

摘要

目的

使用单部位和混合菌斑样本比较侵袭性牙周炎和慢性牙周炎(ChP)的龈下微生物群。

方法

在60例侵袭性或ChP患者中,使用两个无菌纸尖同时从四个最深牙周袋采集龈下菌斑样本。每个牙周袋的一个纸尖放入单独的运输小瓶中,第二个纸尖与该患者的其他三个纸尖混合。分析每个小瓶中的伴放线聚集杆菌、福赛坦氏菌、牙龈卟啉单胞菌和具核梭杆菌的含量。

结果

混合菌斑样本检测到的所有测试病原体数量均高于单部位样本。两种策略的检测频率相似。使用单部位样本时,侵袭性牙周炎中伴放线聚集杆菌的检出率在统计学上显著高于ChP(p=0.01)。侵袭性牙周炎中伴放线聚集杆菌数量较多,其他病原体数量较少。所测试的任何一种细菌的存在与否对侵袭性牙周炎均无足够的阳性或阴性预测价值。

结论

侵袭性牙周炎中伴放线聚集杆菌的检出数量和频率高于ChP。其检测可能有助于临床诊断并影响治疗。作为一种诊断测试,其敏感性和预测价值较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验