Thorneloe Susan A, Weitz Keith, Jambeck Jenna
US EPA/Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division (MD E305-02), Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Waste Manag. 2007;27(8):1006-20. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.024. Epub 2007 Apr 12.
The US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) launched the Resource Conservation Challenge (RCC) in 2002 to help reduce waste and move towards more sustainable resource consumption. The objective of the RCC is to help communities, industries, and the public think in terms of materials management rather than waste disposal. Reducing cost, finding more efficient and effective strategies to manage municipal waste, and thinking in terms of materials management requires a holistic approach that considers life-cycle environmental tradeoffs. The US EPA's National Risk Management Research Laboratory has led the development of a municipal solid waste decision support tool (MSW-DST). The computer software can be used to calculate life-cycle environmental tradeoffs and full costs of different waste management or materials recovery programs. The environmental methodology is based on the use of life-cycle assessment and the cost methodology is based on the use of full-cost accounting. Life-cycle inventory (LCI) environmental impacts and costs are calculated from the point of collection, handling, transport, treatment, and disposal. For any materials that are recovered for recycling, offsets are calculated to reflect potential emissions savings from use of virgin materials. The use of the MSW-DST provides a standardized format and consistent basis to compare alternatives. This paper provides an illustration of how the MSW-DST can be used by evaluating ten management strategies for a hypothetical medium-sized community to compare the life-cycle environmental and cost tradeoffs. The LCI results from the MSW-DST are then used as inputs into another US EPA tool, the Tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts, to convert the LCI results into impact indicators. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate how the MSW-DST can be used to identify and balance multiple criteria (costs and environmental impacts) when evaluating options for materials and waste management. This type of approach is needed in identifying strategies that lead to reduced waste and more sustainable resource consumption. This helps to meet the goals established in the US EPA's Resource Conservation Challenge.
美国环境保护局(US EPA)于2002年发起了资源保护挑战(RCC),以帮助减少浪费并朝着更可持续的资源消费迈进。RCC的目标是帮助社区、行业和公众从材料管理而非废物处置的角度进行思考。降低成本、找到更高效有效的策略来管理城市垃圾以及从材料管理的角度进行思考,需要一种考虑生命周期环境权衡的整体方法。美国环境保护局的国家风险管理研究实验室牵头开发了一种城市固体废物决策支持工具(MSW-DST)。该计算机软件可用于计算不同废物管理或材料回收计划的生命周期环境权衡和全部成本。环境方法基于生命周期评估的使用,成本方法基于全成本核算的使用。生命周期清单(LCI)的环境影响和成本是从收集、处理、运输、处理和处置点开始计算的。对于任何回收用于再利用的材料,都会计算抵消量,以反映使用原生材料可能节省的排放量。MSW-DST的使用提供了一种标准化格式和一致的基础来比较各种替代方案。本文通过评估一个假设的中型社区的十种管理策略,以比较生命周期环境和成本权衡,来说明如何使用MSW-DST。然后,将MSW-DST的LCI结果用作美国环境保护局的另一个工具——化学和其他环境影响减少与评估工具的输入,以将LCI结果转换为影响指标。本文的目标是展示在评估材料和废物管理选项时,如何使用MSW-DST来识别和平衡多个标准(成本和环境影响)。在确定能够减少废物和实现更可持续资源消费的策略时,需要这种方法。这有助于实现美国环境保护局资源保护挑战中设定的目标。