• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在青光眼筛查中最大化非接触眼压测量法的灵敏度和特异性。

Maximising the sensitivity and specificity of non-contact tonometry in glaucoma screening.

作者信息

Vernon S A, Jones S J, Henry D J

机构信息

Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, University of Nottingham.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 1991;5 ( Pt 4):491-3. doi: 10.1038/eye.1991.80.

DOI:10.1038/eye.1991.80
PMID:1743367
Abstract

Data from a glaucoma screening study involving 88.5% of the population age 50 and over of a single handed general practitioner were reanalysed to determine the effect of altering the protocol for intraocular pressure assessment and the effect of changing the referral threshold. The predictive power of the Keeler Pulsair noncontact tonometer was found to decrease from 22.5% at four pulses per eye to 12.3% when only one pulse per eye was used, with a reduction of sensitivity from 91.7% to 75%. The sensitivity of the same device fell from 91.7% if all patients with an IOP greater than 21 mmHg were deemed as having a positive screen, to 41.6% when only patients with an IOP greater than 26 mmHg were considered for referral. To create a balance between high sensitivity and acceptable predictive power of a positive result in a population where 50% of glaucoma sufferers are known prior to screening, we advise that four pulses per eye should be used with an IOP of greater than 22 mmHg used as the significant finding indicating that the patient required referral.

摘要

对一项青光眼筛查研究的数据进行了重新分析,该研究涵盖了一位全科医生接诊的50岁及以上人群的88.5%,以确定改变眼压评估方案的效果以及改变转诊阈值的影响。结果发现,Keeler Pulsair非接触眼压计的预测能力从每只眼睛测量4次脉搏时的22.5%降至每只眼睛仅测量1次脉搏时的12.3%,灵敏度从91.7%降至75%。如果将所有眼压高于21 mmHg的患者视为筛查阳性,则同一设备的灵敏度从91.7%降至仅考虑将眼压高于26 mmHg的患者转诊时的41.6%。为了在已知50%的青光眼患者在筛查前已确诊的人群中,在高灵敏度和阳性结果可接受的预测能力之间取得平衡,我们建议每只眼睛测量4次脉搏,并将眼压高于22 mmHg作为表明患者需要转诊的显著发现。

相似文献

1
Maximising the sensitivity and specificity of non-contact tonometry in glaucoma screening.在青光眼筛查中最大化非接触眼压测量法的灵敏度和特异性。
Eye (Lond). 1991;5 ( Pt 4):491-3. doi: 10.1038/eye.1991.80.
2
Intraocular pressure asymmetry in a population tested with the Pulsair non-contact tonometer.
Eye (Lond). 1991;5 ( Pt 6):674-7. doi: 10.1038/eye.1991.124.
3
Intra-eye pressure range and pulse profiles in normals with the Pulsair non-contact tonometer.使用Pulsair非接触眼压计测量正常人的眼内压范围和脉搏曲线。
Eye (Lond). 1993;7 ( Pt 1):134-7. doi: 10.1038/eye.1993.28.
4
Glaucoma screening in primary care: the role of noncontact tonometry.基层医疗中的青光眼筛查:非接触眼压测量法的作用
J Fam Pract. 1992 Jan;34(1):73-7.
5
Screening for glaucoma in the community by non-ophthalmologically trained staff using semi automated equipment.
Eye (Lond). 1990;4 ( Pt 1):89-97. doi: 10.1038/eye.1990.10.
6
Comparison of a new non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.新型非接触眼压计与戈德曼压平眼压计的比较。
Eye (Lond). 1989;3 ( Pt 3):332-7. doi: 10.1038/eye.1989.48.
7
Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000, American Optical MkII and Goldmann applanation tonometers.Keeler Pulsair 2000眼压计、美国光学MkII眼压计和Goldmann压平眼压计的临床比较。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996 Mar;16(2):171-7.
8
[A comparison study of pulsitile ocular blood flow in normal eyes and primary open angle glaucoma].[正常眼与原发性开角型青光眼搏动性眼血流的比较研究]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2004 Apr;40(4):250-3.
9
[Comparison of tonometry with the Keeler air puff non-contact tonometer "Pulsair" and the Goldmann applanation tonometer].[使用Keeler气吹式非接触眼压计“Pulsair”与Goldmann压平眼压计测量眼压的比较]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1990 Oct;197(4):329-34. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1046288.
10
Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patients.超重患者使用Goldmann压平眼压计与Perkins手持式压平眼压计测量的眼压差
Ophthalmology. 1998 Dec;105(12):2260-3. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91226-X.

引用本文的文献

1
Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals.非接触眼压测量法与戈德曼压平眼压测量法之间眼压测量值的差异以及中央角膜厚度在影响青光眼转诊中的作用。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Feb;188(1):321-325. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1795-0. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
2
Appraising evaluations of screening/diagnostic tests: the importance of the study populations.评估筛查/诊断试验的评价:研究人群的重要性。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Oct;84(10):1198-202. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.10.1198.
3
[Comparative study of pneumotonometer and Goldmann tonometer for screening high intraocular pressure in primary care].
[眼压计与戈德曼眼压计在初级保健中筛查高眼压的比较研究]
Aten Primaria. 2000 Apr 30;25(7):493-6. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(00)78550-7.