Roy Shovonlal, Chattopadhyay J
Agricultural and Ecological Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute 203, B T Road, Kolkata 700 108, India.
J Biosci. 2007 Mar;32(2):421-8. doi: 10.1007/s12038-007-0040-1.
In theory, enrichment of resource in a predator-prey model leads to destabilization of the system,thereby collapsing the trophic interaction,a phenomenon referred to as "the paradox of enrichment". After it was first pro posed by Rosenzweig (1971), a number of subsequent studies were carried out on this dilemma over many decades. In this article, we review these theoretical and experimental works and give a brief overview of the proposed solutions to the paradox. The mechanisms that have been discussed are modifications of simple predator -prey models in the presence of prey that is inedible, invulnerable, unpalatable and toxic. Another class of mechanisms includes an incorporation of a ratio-dependent functional form,inducible defence of prey and density-dependent mortality of the predator. Moreover, we find a third set of explanations based on complex population dynamics including chaos in space and time. We conclude that,although any one of the various mechanisms proposed so far might potentially prevent destabilization of the predator-prey dynamics following enrichment, in nature different mechanisms may combine to cause stability, even when a system is enriched. The exact mechanisms,which may differ among systems,need to be disentangled through extensive field studies and laboratory experiments coupled with realistic theoretical models.
理论上,在捕食者 - 猎物模型中资源的富集会导致系统不稳定,从而破坏营养级相互作用,这种现象被称为“富集悖论”。自罗森茨威格(1971年)首次提出该悖论后,几十年来针对这一困境开展了大量后续研究。在本文中,我们回顾了这些理论和实验工作,并简要概述了针对该悖论所提出的解决方案。已讨论的机制包括在存在不可食、无防御能力、不可口和有毒猎物的情况下对简单捕食者 - 猎物模型的修正。另一类机制包括纳入比率依赖功能形式、猎物的诱导防御以及捕食者的密度依赖死亡率。此外,我们发现了基于复杂种群动态(包括时空混沌)的第三组解释。我们得出结论,尽管目前提出的各种机制中的任何一种都可能潜在地防止富集后捕食者 - 猎物动态的不稳定,但在自然界中,即使一个系统被富集,不同的机制也可能共同作用以实现稳定。确切的机制可能因系统而异,需要通过广泛的实地研究、实验室实验以及现实的理论模型来厘清。