Franchini Emerson, Nunes Alexandre Velly, Moraes Josué Morisson, Del Vecchio Fabrício Boscolo
School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
J Physiol Anthropol. 2007 Mar;26(2):59-67. doi: 10.2114/jpa2.26.59.
The present study had as objectives (1) to compare the morphological and functional characteristics of the male judo players of the Brazilian Team A (n=7) with the judo players of Teams B and C (reserves; n=15), and (2) to verify the association between the variables measured. Thus, 22 athletes from the seven Olympic weight categories were submitted to: a body composition evaluation (body mass, height, ten skinfolds, eight circumferences, three bone diameters and percent body fat estimation); the Special Judo Fitness Test (SJFT); maximal strength tests (one repetition-maximum, 1 RM, in bench press, row, and squat); and the Cooper test. One-way analysis of covariance was used to compare the groups. The relationships between variables were determined by the Pearson coefficient correlation. The significance level was fixed at 5%. No significant difference was found in any variable between them. The main significant correlations observed were between the following variables: VO2max and number of throws in the SJFT (r=0.79); percent body fat and estimated VO2max (r=-0.83) and number of throws in the SJFT (r=-0.70); chest circumference and bench press 1 RM (r=0.90) and in the row (r=0.80); and thigh circumference and squat 1 RM (r=0.86). However, there was no significant correlation between circumferences and 1 RM/kg of body mass. According to these results the main conclusions are: (1) the physical variables measured do not discriminate performance when analysis is directed to the best athletes; (2) a higher percent body fat is negatively correlated with performance in activities with body mass locomotion (Cooper test and the SJFT); (3) judo players with higher aerobic power performed better in high-intensity intermittent exercise; (4) judo players with bigger circumferences present bigger absolute maximal strength.
(1)比较巴西A队男性柔道运动员(n = 7)与B队和C队(替补队员;n = 15)柔道运动员的形态和功能特征;(2)验证所测变量之间的关联。因此,来自七个奥运体重级别的22名运动员接受了以下测试:身体成分评估(体重、身高、十处皮褶厚度、八处周长、三处骨直径和体脂百分比估算);特殊柔道体能测试(SJFT);最大力量测试(卧推、划船和深蹲的一次重复最大值,即1RM);以及库珀测试。采用单因素协方差分析对各组进行比较。变量之间的关系通过皮尔逊系数相关性确定。显著性水平设定为5%。两组之间在任何变量上均未发现显著差异。观察到的主要显著相关性存在于以下变量之间:最大摄氧量(VO2max)与SJFT中的投技次数(r = 0.79);体脂百分比与估算的VO2max(r = -0.83)以及SJFT中的投技次数(r = -0.70);胸围与卧推1RM(r = 0.90)以及划船(r = 0.80);大腿围与深蹲1RM(r = 0.86)。然而,周长与每千克体重的1RM之间没有显著相关性。根据这些结果,主要结论如下:(1)当针对最佳运动员进行分析时,所测身体变量无法区分表现;(2)较高的体脂百分比与体重移动活动(库珀测试和SJFT)中的表现呈负相关;(3)有氧能力较高的柔道运动员在高强度间歇运动中表现更好;(4)周长较大的柔道运动员具有更大的绝对最大力量。