Drid Patrik, Casals Cristina, Mekic Amel, Radjo Izet, Stojanovic Marko, Ostojic Sergej M
1Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia; 2Department of Physiology, Institute of Food Nutrition and Technology, Biomedical Research Centre, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; and 3Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Europe.
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Aug;29(8):2115-21. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000861.
The aim of the study was to determine the anthropometric and fitness profiles of European half-heavyweight judokas by success in competition. For this purpose, we compared 5 international medalists (elite) with 5 national medalists (subelite). All male judokas won at least 1 medal in the half-heavyweight category during the previous 2 years. The testing in this cross-sectional study was performed during 4 days. All subjects underwent anthropometric assessment with body mass, height, skinfold, and limb circumference measures, and the body fat percentage was estimated by manual bioimpedance. The physical fitness evaluation consisted in peak torques for thigh and shoulder muscles, handgrip strength, high and long jumps, medicine ball throw, pull-ups, deadlift, bench press, deep squat, V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, Max Power, and Tokui Waza tests. The statistical analysis by the Student's t test showed significant differences for forearm and upper-arm circumferences, peak torques, pull-ups, bench press, deadlift, deep squat, V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, Max Power, and Tokui Waza tests. Our results showed that elite judokas have a superior fitness profile than subelite athletes from the half-heavyweight category. Moreover, elite judokas seem to have a higher arm muscle mass than subelite athletes but a similar body fat percentage. This study could be of interest for judo coaches with athletes competing in the half-heavyweight category, as some tests that discriminate by judo success for this specific weight category are described. Few studies analyze anthropometric and fitness profiles in half-heavyweight male judokas, so additionally our results can be used as a reference for coaches, athletes, and scientists.
本研究的目的是通过比赛成绩来确定欧洲半重量级柔道运动员的人体测量学和体能状况。为此,我们将5名国际奖牌获得者(精英组)与5名国家奖牌获得者(次精英组)进行了比较。所有男性柔道运动员在过去两年内在半重量级比赛中至少获得过1枚奖牌。这项横断面研究的测试在4天内完成。所有受试者都接受了人体测量评估,包括体重、身高、皮褶厚度和肢体周长测量,并通过手动生物电阻抗法估算体脂百分比。体能评估包括大腿和肩部肌肉的峰值扭矩、握力、跳高和跳远、药球投掷、引体向上、硬拉、卧推、深蹲、最大摄氧量、最大功率和特久技测试。通过学生t检验进行的统计分析显示,在前臂和上臂周长、峰值扭矩、引体向上、卧推、硬拉、深蹲、最大摄氧量、最大功率和特久技测试方面存在显著差异。我们的结果表明,精英组柔道运动员比半重量级次精英组运动员具有更优越的体能状况。此外,精英组柔道运动员的手臂肌肉量似乎比次精英组运动员更高,但体脂百分比相似。这项研究可能会引起参与半重量级比赛的柔道教练的兴趣,因为文中描述了一些针对该特定体重级别的、能根据柔道成绩进行区分的测试。很少有研究分析半重量级男性柔道运动员的人体测量学和体能状况,因此我们的结果还可以为教练、运动员和科学家提供参考。