Uppal Baljeet, Flinn William R, Benjamin Marshall E
Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA.
Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2007 Mar;19(1):78-84. doi: 10.1177/1531003506298078.
Since the introduction of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters more than 30 years ago, there has been a steady improvement in the design, ease, and safety of the delivery systems. Today, all of the commonly used filters can be placed via a peripheral vein by using standard percutaneous Seldinger technique. However, this typically requires fluoroscopy, intravenous contrast agents, radiation exposure, and transport of the patient to the interventional or operating suite. In the multiply injured trauma or critically-ill intensive care unit patient, often requiring inotropic and ventilator support, transport to these facilities can be hazardous. In addition, these patients frequently have a combination of neurospinal and long bone injuries, which require skeletal immobilization, thus further complicating transportation. Advancing technology with portable duplex ultrasound and improved deep abdominal duplex imaging has allowed for routine diagnostic evaluation of the IVC, renal veins, and surrounding visceral structures. This degree of accuracy has allowed numerous centers to gain experience with ultrasonic imaging of the IVC and insertion site after a filter has been placed. A logical progression has evolved to the point in which, today, duplex ultrasound can be used to guide the insertion of IVC filters. The following describes, in detail, a technique for the percutaneous placement of an IVC filter at the bedside using only duplex ultrasound guidance. The article also briefly compares and contrasts this technique with an alternate technique using intravascular ultrasound. Vena caval interruption can be safely performed under ultrasound guidance in a monitored, intensive care unit environment. In selected intensive care unit or multiply injured trauma patients, this will reduce the risk, complexity and cost of transport for these critically ill patients. Duplex-guided IVC filter placement also reduces procedural costs compared to an operating room or interventional suite, and eliminates intravenous contrast material exposure.
自30多年前引入下腔静脉(IVC)滤器以来,输送系统的设计、操作便利性和安全性一直在稳步改进。如今,所有常用的滤器都可以通过标准的经皮Seldinger技术经外周静脉置入。然而,这通常需要荧光透视、静脉造影剂、辐射暴露,并且要将患者转运至介入室或手术室。在多发伤的创伤患者或重症监护病房的危重病患者中,这些患者通常需要使用血管活性药物和呼吸机支持,转运至这些场所可能具有危险性。此外,这些患者经常合并神经脊柱和长骨损伤,需要进行骨骼固定,这进一步增加了转运的复杂性。便携式双功超声技术的发展以及深部腹部双功成像的改进,使得对下腔静脉、肾静脉及周围内脏结构进行常规诊断评估成为可能。这种精确程度使许多中心在滤器置入后,获得了对下腔静脉及置入部位进行超声成像的经验。顺理成章地,如今双功超声已发展到可用于引导下腔静脉滤器的置入。以下详细描述一种仅使用双功超声引导在床边经皮置入下腔静脉滤器的技术。本文还简要比较并对比了该技术与使用血管内超声的另一种技术。在监测的重症监护病房环境中,可在超声引导下安全地进行腔静脉阻断。对于选定的重症监护病房患者或多发伤创伤患者,这将降低这些危重病患者的转运风险、复杂性和成本。与在手术室或介入室相比,双功超声引导下腔静脉滤器置入还可降低手术成本,并消除静脉造影剂暴露。