Suppr超能文献

特发性正常压力脑积水患者的腰椎脑脊液压力波与颅内压力波对比

Lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure waves versus intracranial pressure waves in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

作者信息

Eide P K, Brean A

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Br J Neurosurg. 2006 Dec;20(6):407-14. doi: 10.1080/02688690601047312.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore how the lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) waves recorded during lumbar infusion compared with the intracranial pressure (ICP) waves recorded, either during lumbar infusion or during long-term, overnight monitoring. For this purpose, we assessed 27 simultaneous lumbar CSFP/ICP recordings made during lumbar infusion and 27 long-term, overnight ICP recordings in 27 consecutive idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) patients. Pressure waves during lumbar infusion were explored by computing pulse pressure amplitude and mean single wave pressure of every corresponding CSFP/ICP wave pair; among our 27 lumbar CSFP/ICP recordings a total of 35,532 CSFP/ICP wave pairs were available for analysis. We as well computed mean values of pulse pressure amplitude (i.e. mean CSFP wave amplitude or mean ICP wave amplitude) and mean values of mean single wave pressure (i.e. mean CSFP or mean ICP) during consecutive 6-s time windows, as well as average values for the individual recordings. During lumbar infusion, the cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure amplitudes were about 2 mmHg smaller than the corresponding intracranial pulse pressure amplitudes. The mean CSFP wave amplitudes recorded during lumbar infusion correlated significantly with the mean ICP wave amplitudes recorded either during lumbar infusion or during long-term, overnight ICP monitoring. In 21 of 27 lumbar infusion tests (78%), the presence of elevated lumbar mean CSFP waves was related to presence of elevated mean ICP wave amplitudes during long-term, overnight ICP monitoring. Hence, the lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure amplitudes recorded during lumbar infusion could be used to predict the intracranial pulse pressure amplitudes recorded during long-term, overnight ICP monitoring.

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨在腰椎输注期间记录的腰段脑脊液压力(CSFP)波与在腰椎输注期间或长期夜间监测期间记录的颅内压(ICP)波相比如何。为此,我们评估了27例连续特发性正常压力脑积水(iNPH)患者在腰椎输注期间同时进行的腰段CSFP/ICP记录以及27例长期夜间ICP记录。通过计算每对相应CSFP/ICP波的脉压幅度和平均单波压力来探究腰椎输注期间的压力波;在我们的27例腰段CSFP/ICP记录中,共有35532对CSFP/ICP波可用于分析。我们还计算了连续6秒时间窗内脉压幅度的平均值(即平均CSFP波幅度或平均ICP波幅度)和平均单波压力的平均值(即平均CSFP或平均ICP),以及各个记录的平均值。在腰椎输注期间,脑脊液脉压幅度比相应的颅内脉压幅度小约2 mmHg。在腰椎输注期间记录的平均CSFP波幅度与在腰椎输注期间或长期夜间ICP监测期间记录的平均ICP波幅度显著相关。在27次腰椎输注测试中的21次(78%)中,腰段平均CSFP波升高与长期夜间ICP监测期间平均ICP波幅度升高有关。因此,在腰椎输注期间记录的腰段脑脊液脉压幅度可用于预测长期夜间ICP监测期间记录的颅内脉压幅度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验