van Walbeek Corné, Blecher Evan, van Graan Madalet
School of Economics, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
S Afr Med J. 2007 Mar;97(3):208-11.
To investigate the impact of the restrictions on smoking in indoor public places on the financial situation of the hospitality industry.
A telephone survey was undertaken of 1011 restaurants, selected by searching public-access Internet databases.
Fifty per cent of surveyed restaurants spent an average of R67 000 (median of R25 000) to comply with the clean indoor air legislation. The capital cost for the remaining 50% of restaurants was zero. The impact on restaurant revenues was limited: 59% of restaurants reported no change in revenue, 22% an increase and 19% a decrease as a result of the legislation. Franchised restaurants experienced a net gain in revenue (34% reporting an increase, 16% reporting a decrease, and 50% reporting no change), although on average they incurred more costs to comply with the legislation than independent restaurants. On average, independent restaurants reported a decrease in their revenues as a result of the legislation (21% reporting a decrease, 13% reporting an increase, and 66% reporting no change). Ninety-two per cent of respondents believed that their restaurants complied with the legislation. The new smoking policies have been well accepted by nonsmokers (nearly 100%) and smokers (87%) alike.
Despite the hospitality and tobacco industries' claim that the law restricting smoking in restaurants would have very detrimental financial consequences, the retrospective evidence does not support this.
调查室内公共场所吸烟限制对酒店业财务状况的影响。
通过搜索公共互联网数据库,选取1011家餐厅进行电话调查。
50%的受调查餐厅平均花费6.7万兰特(中位数为2.5万兰特)以遵守室内空气清洁法规。其余50%餐厅的资本成本为零。该法规对餐厅收入的影响有限:59%的餐厅报告收入无变化,22%报告收入增加,19%报告收入减少。连锁餐厅收入实现净增长(34%报告收入增加,16%报告收入减少,50%报告收入无变化),不过平均而言,它们为遵守法规所产生的成本高于独立餐厅。平均而言,独立餐厅报告该法规导致其收入减少(21%报告收入减少,13%报告收入增加,66%报告收入无变化)。92%的受访者认为其餐厅遵守了法规。新的吸烟政策得到了非吸烟者(近100%)和吸烟者(87%)的一致认可。
尽管酒店业和烟草业声称限制餐厅吸烟的法律会产生非常不利的财务后果,但回顾性证据并不支持这一点。