Richard Wietske, Venker Jantine, den Herder Cindy, Kox Dennis, van den Berg Bob, Laman Martin, van Tinteren Harm, de Vries Nico
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, St. Lucas Andreas Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Sep;264(9):1081-6. doi: 10.1007/s00405-007-0311-3. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
In a retrospective cohort study, we evaluated whether improvements in nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) technology, particularly the introduction of automatic adjustment of the nCPAP pressure (auto-CPAP), have led to better acceptance and (long-term) compliance in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) as compared to earlier reported data. Questionnaires were sent to 256 patients, who were referred to our clinic for an overnight polysomnography from January 1997 to July 2005 and received nCPAP therapy for OSAS. Of the 256 patients, 24 patients were unavailable for follow-up. Of the remaining 232 patients, 58 patients (25%) had discontinued therapy, while 174 patients (75%) were still using nCPAP after 2 months to 8 years of follow-up. One Hundred and thirty eight (79%) of these 174 patients used nCPAP for at least 4 h/night during >or= 5 nights/week, 82,1% of the conventional nCPAP (fixed pressure CPAP) group (n = 78) and 77,1% of the auto-CPAP group (n = 96). Therefore, including the 58 failures, only 59.5% of patients can be seen as compliant. There were no statistical differences between the fixed pressure CPAP and auto-CPAP users, and between the compliant and non-compliant users according to age, BMI, AHI and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS). Auto-CPAP patients used significantly more cm H2O. The long-term compliance of nCPAP therapy has have increased only slightly since the introduction of the fixed pressure CPAP 25 years ago, in spite of many efforts to improve it. It seems that a plateau has been reached and that it is unrealistic to aim at a substantially higher compliance rate.
在一项回顾性队列研究中,我们评估了鼻持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)技术的改进,特别是自动调整nCPAP压力(自动CPAP)的引入,与早期报告的数据相比,是否能使阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)患者有更好的接受度和(长期)依从性。我们向256例患者发放了问卷,这些患者于1997年1月至2005年7月被转诊至我们的诊所进行夜间多导睡眠监测,并接受nCPAP治疗以治疗OSAS。在这256例患者中,有24例无法进行随访。在其余232例患者中,58例(25%)已停止治疗,而174例(75%)在随访2个月至8年后仍在使用nCPAP。在这174例患者中,138例(79%)每周至少5个晚上使用nCPAP至少4小时/晚,传统nCPAP(固定压力CPAP)组(n = 78)的这一比例为82.1%,自动CPAP组(n = 96)为77.1%。因此,包括58例未依从者在内,只有59.5%的患者可被视为依从。固定压力CPAP使用者和自动CPAP使用者之间,以及依从和不依从使用者之间,在年龄、体重指数、呼吸暂停低通气指数和爱泼华嗜睡量表(ESS)方面均无统计学差异。自动CPAP患者使用的厘米水柱显著更多。自25年前引入固定压力CPAP以来,尽管为提高nCPAP治疗的长期依从性做出了许多努力,但其长期依从性仅略有提高。似乎已经达到了一个平台期,旨在大幅提高依从率是不现实的。