White Amy M, Banovac Filip, Spies James B
Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Hospital, CG 201, 3800 Reservoir Rd, NW, Washington, DC 2007-2113, USA.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Apr;18(4):573-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.02.012.
The techniques used for uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) have rapidly evolved during the past decade. One source of uncertainty in the UFE technique has been the importance of the contribution of the ovarian artery to the blood supply of the uterus and fibroids. Although conventional aortography is often used after embolization to assess for collateral arterial supply, few patients are identified with sufficient collateral vessels to warrant supplemental embolization. One potential downside of routine aortography is the additional radiation dose. In this study, the radiation dose associated with UFE and the contribution of each component of the procedure to this dose were evaluated, with the specific goal of identifying the contribution from aortography. Although the overall radiation dose associated with UFE is moderate, aortography contributes a substantial amount of additional radiation, more than 20% of the total, which, coupled with its low clinical utility, suggests that the routine use of aortography at the conclusion of UFE should be reconsidered.
在过去十年中,用于子宫肌瘤栓塞术(UFE)的技术迅速发展。UFE技术中一个不确定的来源是卵巢动脉对子宫和肌瘤血液供应的贡献的重要性。尽管栓塞后常使用传统主动脉造影来评估侧支动脉供应,但很少有患者被发现有足够的侧支血管来进行补充栓塞。常规主动脉造影的一个潜在缺点是额外的辐射剂量。在本研究中,评估了与UFE相关的辐射剂量以及该手术各组成部分对该剂量的贡献,具体目标是确定主动脉造影的贡献。尽管与UFE相关的总体辐射剂量适中,但主动脉造影会带来大量额外辐射,超过总量的20%,再加上其临床效用较低,这表明在UFE结束时常规使用主动脉造影应重新考虑。