• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院医师和在职医师在所选降压药的类型和费用方面是否存在差异?

Do resident and staff physicians differ in the types and costs of antihypertensive drugs they select?

作者信息

Payne T H, Goodson J D, Morgan M M, Barnett G O

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1991 Sep-Oct;6(5):439-44. doi: 10.1007/BF02598167.

DOI:10.1007/BF02598167
PMID:1744760
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the types and costs of drugs prescribed by resident and staff physicians treating patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study, using a computer-based medical record database.

SETTING

Primary care internal medicine clinic in a large teaching hospital.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Hypertensive patients seen by ten postgraduate year-1 (PGY-1) and PGY-2 primary care internal medicine residents and four staff physicians practicing in the same clinic.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The types and costs of antihypertensive drugs prescribed for the patients treated by resident and staff physicians were compared. A larger proportion of patients of resident physicians than of staff physicians were treated with calcium channel blockers [19(15%) vs. 40(4%), p less than 0.001]; residents prescribed thiazide diuretics less frequently and beta-blockers more frequently than did staff physicians, although these differences were not significant. The estimated average wholesale price of antihypertensive drugs for patients cared for by residents was 35% higher than that for patients cared for by staff physicians ($0.73 vs. $0.54, p = 0.048). This difference was not fully explained by differences in practice composition.

CONCLUSIONS

Resident physicians in this study selected more expensive medications to treat hypertension than did their faculty preceptors, even when differences in practice composition were considered.

摘要

目的

比较住院医师和主治医师为单纯性原发性高血压患者开具的药物类型及费用。

设计

采用基于计算机的病历数据库进行横断面研究。

地点

一家大型教学医院的初级保健内科诊所。

患者/参与者:由10名第一年(PGY - 1)和第二年(PGY - 2)初级保健内科住院医师以及在同一诊所执业的4名主治医师诊治的高血压患者。

测量与主要结果

比较住院医师和主治医师为患者开具的抗高血压药物的类型及费用。住院医师治疗的患者中,使用钙通道阻滞剂的比例高于主治医师[19例(15%)对40例(4%),p<0.001];住院医师开具噻嗪类利尿剂的频率低于主治医师,开具β受体阻滞剂的频率高于主治医师,尽管这些差异不显著。住院医师诊治患者的抗高血压药物估计平均批发价高于主治医师诊治患者的平均批发价35%(0.73美元对0.54美元,p = 0.048)。实践构成的差异并不能完全解释这种差异。

结论

在本研究中,即使考虑实践构成的差异,住院医师治疗高血压时选择的药物比带教教师选择的更昂贵。

相似文献

1
Do resident and staff physicians differ in the types and costs of antihypertensive drugs they select?住院医师和在职医师在所选降压药的类型和费用方面是否存在差异?
J Gen Intern Med. 1991 Sep-Oct;6(5):439-44. doi: 10.1007/BF02598167.
2
Effect of Attending Practice Style on Generic Medication Prescribing by Residents in the Clinic Setting: An Observational Study.门诊环境中带教医师执业风格对住院医师开具非专利药物处方的影响:一项观察性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Sep;30(9):1286-93. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3323-5.
3
Antihypertensive drug prescription trends at the primary health care centres in Bahrain.巴林初级卫生保健中心的抗高血压药物处方趋势
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001 May;10(3):219-27. doi: 10.1002/pds.578.
4
Quality of US primary care delivered by resident and staff physicians.美国住院医师和主治医生提供的初级保健质量。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Nov;25(11):1193-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1456-0. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
5
What do attending physicians contribute in a house officer-based ambulatory continuity clinic?在以住院医师为主的门诊连续性诊所中,主治医生发挥着什么作用?
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 May;21(5):435-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00423.x.
6
Cost-minimization and the number needed to treat in uncomplicated hypertension.单纯性高血压的成本最小化与需治疗人数
Am J Hypertens. 1998 May;11(5):618-29. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(97)00488-3.
7
Gap between evidence and physicians' knowledge and practice regarding hypertension and its drug treatment: a survey in a Chinese city.高血压及其药物治疗方面的证据与医生的知识和实践之间的差距:中国某城市的一项调查。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 Apr;124(8):1235-41.
8
Antihypertensive use, prescription patterns, and cost of medications in a Teaching Hospital in Lagos, Nigeria.尼日利亚拉各斯一家教学医院的抗高血压药物使用情况、处方模式及药物成本
Niger J Clin Pract. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(5):668-72. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.188709.
9
Treating hypertension. Are the right drugs given to the right patients?治疗高血压。是否给合适的患者用了合适的药物?
Can Fam Physician. 1998 Feb;44:294-8, 301-2.
10
Prescribing patterns and cost of antihypertensive drugs in an internal medicine clinic.内科门诊抗高血压药物的处方模式及费用
Indian Heart J. 2001 May-Jun;53(3):323-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing healthcare research data warehouse design through past COSTAR query analysis.通过过往的COSTAR查询分析优化医疗保健研究数据仓库设计。
Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:892-6.

本文引用的文献

1
The application of computer-based medical-record systems in ambulatory practice.基于计算机的病历系统在门诊医疗中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 1984 Jun 21;310(25):1643-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198406213102506.
2
Opportunities for improving the cost-effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment.提高抗高血压治疗成本效益的机会。
Am J Med. 1986 Dec 31;81(6C):45-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90528-0.
3
Financial cost as an obstacle to hypertension therapy.经济成本成为高血压治疗的障碍。
Am J Public Health. 1986 Sep;76(9):1105-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.9.1105.
4
"Cost containment" in the management of hypertension.高血压管理中的“成本控制”
Ann Intern Med. 1987 Jul;107(1):107-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-107-1-107.
5
The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life.抗高血压治疗对生活质量的影响。
N Engl J Med. 1986 Jun 26;314(26):1657-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198606263142602.
6
Influence of simple computerized feedback on prescription charges in an ambulatory clinic. A randomized clinical trial.
Med Care. 1986 Jun;24(6):472-81. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198606000-00002.
7
Microx.微克斯。(不太明确这个词具体含义,可能是特定名称之类,你可补充更多背景信息以便我更准确翻译)
Med Lett Drugs Ther. 1988 Jun 17;30(768):63-4.
8
The effect of computerized feedback coupled with a newsletter upon outpatient prescribing charges. A randomized controlled trial.计算机化反馈结合时事通讯对门诊处方费用的影响。一项随机对照试验。
Med Care. 1988 Jan;26(1):88-94. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198801000-00010.
9
In defense of alternative antihypertensive therapy.为替代抗高血压治疗辩护。
Hypertension. 1988 Sep;12(3):327-9. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.12.3.327.
10
In defense of traditional antihypertensive therapy.为传统抗高血压疗法辩护。
Hypertension. 1988 Sep;12(3):324-6. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.12.3.324.