• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗高血压治疗对生活质量的影响。

The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life.

作者信息

Croog S H, Levine S, Testa M A, Brown B, Bulpitt C J, Jenkins C D, Klerman G L, Williams G H

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1986 Jun 26;314(26):1657-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198606263142602.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM198606263142602
PMID:3520318
Abstract

We conducted a multicenter randomized double-blind clinical trial among 626 men with mild to moderate hypertension to determine the effects of captopril, methyldopa, and propranolol on their quality of life. Hydrochlorothiazide was added if needed to control blood pressure. After a 24-week treatment period, all three groups had similar blood-pressure control, although fewer patients taking propranolol required hydrochlorothiazide. Patients taking captopril alone or in combination with a diuretic were least likely to withdraw from treatment because of adverse effects (8 percent vs. 20 percent for methyldopa and 13 percent for propranolol). The treatment groups were similar in scores for sleep dysfunction, visual memory, and social participation. However, patients taking captopril, as compared with patients taking methyldopa, scored significantly higher (P less than 0.05 to less than 0.01) on measures of general well-being, had fewer side effects, and had better scores for work performance, visual-motor functioning, and measures of life satisfaction. Patients taking propranolol also reported better work performance than patients taking methyldopa. Patients taking captopril reported fewer side effects and less sexual dysfunction than those taking propranolol and had greater improvement (P less than 0.05 to less than 0.01) on measures of general well-being. Our findings show that antihypertensive agents have different effects on the quality of life and that these can be meaningfully assessed with available psychosocial measures.

摘要

我们在626名轻度至中度高血压男性中开展了一项多中心随机双盲临床试验,以确定卡托普利、甲基多巴和普萘洛尔对其生活质量的影响。必要时加用氢氯噻嗪以控制血压。经过24周的治疗期后,尽管服用普萘洛尔的患者需要加用氢氯噻嗪的较少,但三组的血压控制情况相似。单独服用卡托普利或与利尿剂联合服用的患者因不良反应而退出治疗的可能性最小(分别为8%,而甲基多巴组为20%,普萘洛尔组为13%)。治疗组在睡眠障碍、视觉记忆和社会参与方面的得分相似。然而,与服用甲基多巴的患者相比,服用卡托普利的患者在总体幸福感测量方面得分显著更高(P小于0.05至小于0.01),副作用更少,工作表现、视觉运动功能和生活满意度测量得分更高。服用普萘洛尔的患者工作表现也比服用甲基多巴的患者更好。与服用普萘洛尔的患者相比,服用卡托普利的患者报告的副作用和性功能障碍更少,在总体幸福感测量方面改善更大(P小于0.05至小于0.01)。我们的研究结果表明,抗高血压药物对生活质量有不同影响,并且可以通过现有的社会心理测量方法进行有意义的评估。

相似文献

1
The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life.抗高血压治疗对生活质量的影响。
N Engl J Med. 1986 Jun 26;314(26):1657-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198606263142602.
2
Effects of antihypertensive medications on vitality and well-being.抗高血压药物对活力和幸福感的影响。
J Fam Pract. 1987 Oct;25(4):357-63.
3
Sexual symptoms in hypertensive patients. A clinical trial of antihypertensive medications.高血压患者的性症状。一项抗高血压药物的临床试验。
Arch Intern Med. 1988 Apr;148(4):788-94.
4
Impact of antihypertensive therapy on quality of life: effect of hydrochlorothiazide.抗高血压治疗对生活质量的影响:氢氯噻嗪的作用
J Hypertens Suppl. 1987 Feb;5(1):S29-35.
5
Quality of life in normotensives compared to hypertensive men treated with isradipine or methyldopa as monotherapy or in combination with captopril: the LOMIR-MCT-IL study.与接受伊拉地平或甲基多巴单药治疗或联合卡托普利治疗的高血压男性相比,血压正常男性的生活质量:LOMIR-MCT-IL研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 1996 Feb;10(2):117-22.
6
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and quality of life: the European trial.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与生活质量:欧洲试验
J Hypertens Suppl. 1985 Nov;3(2):S91-4.
7
[The long-term monotherapy with preparations from the 4 basic groups of antihypertensive agents of patients with mild and moderate arterial hypertension. The Multicenter Captopril and the Quality of Life Study. The working group of the Multicenter Captopril and the Quality of Life Study].[轻度和中度动脉高血压患者使用4种基本抗高血压药物制剂的长期单一疗法。多中心卡托普利与生活质量研究。多中心卡托普利与生活质量研究工作组]
Ter Arkh. 1995;67(6):15-20.
8
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of enalapril plus hydrochlorothiazide plus methyldopa vs standard triple therapy in the treatment of moderate to severe hypertension: results from a multicentre study.依那普利联合氢氯噻嗪联合甲基多巴与标准三联疗法治疗中重度高血压的疗效和安全性评估:一项多中心研究结果
J Hum Hypertens. 1990 Feb;4(1):5-11.
9
Comparison of low-dose captopril and propranolol as second-line drugs in mild and moderate hypertension.低剂量卡托普利与普萘洛尔作为轻中度高血压二线药物的比较。
Isr J Med Sci. 1985 Sep;21(9):737-41.
10
Self-reported side effects from antihypertensive drugs. A clinical trial. Quality of Life Research Group.抗高血压药物的自我报告副作用。一项临床试验。生活质量研究小组。
Am J Hypertens. 1990 Feb;3(2):123-32. doi: 10.1093/ajh/3.2.123.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of the CHDSI Questionnaire: A New Tool for Measuring Disease-Specific Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents with Congenital Heart Defects.先天性心脏病患儿和青少年疾病特异性生活质量测量新工具CHDSI问卷的开发与验证
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 21;61(7):1311. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071311.
2
Does social support improve self-management among rural hypertensive patients? An empirical analysis based on generalized propensity score matching.社会支持能否改善农村高血压患者的自我管理?基于广义倾向得分匹配的实证分析。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;12:1445946. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1445946. eCollection 2024.
3
Improved Items for Estimating SF-36 Profile and Summary Component Scores: Construction and Validation of an 8-Item QOL General (QGEN) Survey.
用于评估SF-36量表简表及汇总成分得分的改良条目:8条目生活质量通用(QGEN)调查问卷的构建与验证
Med Care. 2025 Apr 1;63(4):300-310. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002122. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
4
Flaxseed Lowers Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Subjects: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.亚麻籽降低高血压患者的血压:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Nutr Res. 2024 Oct 29;13(4):295-306. doi: 10.7762/cnr.2024.13.4.295. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
β-Blockers and Erectile Dysfunction in Heart Failure. Between Myth and Reality.心力衰竭中的β受体阻滞剂与勃起功能障碍:介于神话与现实之间
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 13;23(5):173. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2305173. eCollection 2022 May.
6
Early Implant Failure in Patients Using Antihypertensive Medications: A Retrospective Cohort Study.使用抗高血压药物患者的早期种植失败:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int Dent J. 2025 Apr;75(2):1081-1087. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
7
Impact of renal denervation on quality of life (How does renal denervation contribute to improving hypertension treatment affected by poor medication adherence?).肾去神经术对生活质量的影响(肾去神经术如何有助于改善因药物依从性差而受影响的高血压治疗?)
Hypertens Res. 2024 Oct;47(10):2652-2658. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01679-7. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
8
Measuring population health and quality of life: Developing and testing of the significant quality of life measure (SigQOLM).衡量人口健康与生活质量:重大生活质量测量法(SigQOLM)的开发与测试
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 29;9(12):e22668. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22668. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Response shift in hearing related quality of life after cochlear implantation - effect size and clinical significance: a then-test study.人工耳蜗植入后听力相关生活质量的反应转移 - 效应大小和临床意义:一项事后测试研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Apr 25;21(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02118-w.
10
The role of social adversity on emotional dysregulation during infancy and early childhood.社会逆境对婴儿期和幼儿期情绪失调的影响。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2023 Sep-Oct;72:26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.03.010. Epub 2023 Apr 8.