Navarra Giuseppe, Musolino Cinzia, De Marco Maria Luisa, Bartolotta Marcello, Barbera Alberto, Centorrino Tommaso
Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Messina, G. Martino University Hospital, V. Cons. Valeria, Messina, Italy.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Apr;17(2):86-90. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318030ca8b.
To compare the early and intermediate results of the open and laparoscopic tension-free repair of incisional hernia, 24 patients were randomized prospectively to undergo laparoscopic or open repair of incisional hernia with retromuscular placement of the prosthesis using transabdominal sutures for mesh fixation. All the procedures were completed as planned. The mean duration of surgery was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P=0.15). Time to oral solid food intake was longer in the open group (P=0.002). The analgesic requirement was lower in the laparoscopic group (P=0.05). One patient after open surgery and 2 in the laparoscopic group suffered postoperative complications (P=0.71). Postoperative stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group (P=0.006). No readmission or recurrence was registered within 6 months from surgery in either group. Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair, based on the Rives-Stoppa technique, is a safe, feasible alternative to open techniques. However, larger studies and long-term follow-up are required to further evaluate the true effectiveness of this operation.
为比较开放性和腹腔镜下无张力切口疝修补术的早期和中期结果,前瞻性地将24例患者随机分为两组,分别接受腹腔镜或开放性切口疝修补术,采用经腹缝合固定补片于肌后间隙。所有手术均按计划完成。两组手术平均时长无显著差异(P = 0.15)。开放组患者开始经口进食固体食物的时间更长(P = 0.002)。腹腔镜组的镇痛需求较低(P = 0.05)。开放手术组有1例患者和腹腔镜组有2例患者出现术后并发症(P = 0.71)。腹腔镜组术后住院时间更短(P = 0.006)。两组在术后6个月内均未出现再次入院或复发情况。基于Rives-Stoppa技术的腹腔镜切口疝修补术是一种安全、可行的开放性手术替代方案。然而,需要更大规模的研究和长期随访来进一步评估该手术的真正疗效。