Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9147-9158. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10446-7. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is increasingly performed worldwide and expected to be superior to conventional open repair regarding hospital stay and quality of life (QoL). The INCisional Hernia-Trial was designed to test this hypothesis.
A multicenter parallel randomized controlled open-label trial with a superiority design was conducted in six hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients with primary or recurrent incisional hernias were randomized by computer-guided block-randomization to undergo either conventional open or laparoscopic repair. Primary endpoint was postoperative length of hospital stay in days. Secondary endpoints included QoL, complications, and recurrences. Patients were followed up for at least 5 years.
Hundred-and-two patients were recruited and randomized. In total, 88 patients underwent surgery and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (44 in the open group, 44 in the laparoscopic group). Mean age was 59.5 years, gender division was equal, and BMI was 28.8 kg/m. The trial was concluded early for futility after an unplanned interim analysis, which showed that the hypothesis needed to be rejected. There was no difference in primary outcome: length of hospital stay was 3 (range 1-36) days in the open group and 3 (range 1-12) days in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.481). There were no significant between-group differences in QoL questionnaires on the short and long term. Satisfaction was impaired in the open group. Overall recurrence rate was 19%, of which 16% in the open and 23% in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.25) at a mean follow-up of 6.6 years.
In a randomized controlled trial, short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair were not superior to open surgery. The persisting high recurrence rates, reduced QoL, and suboptimal satisfaction warrant the need for patient's expectation management in the preoperative process and individualized surgical management.
Netherlands Trial Register NTR2808.
腹腔镜切口疝修补术在全球范围内越来越多地进行,预计在住院时间和生活质量(QoL)方面优于传统的开放修复。INCisional Hernia-Trial 旨在检验这一假设。
这是一项在荷兰六家医院进行的多中心平行随机对照开放标签试验,设计为优效性试验。将原发性或复发性切口疝患者通过计算机引导的分组随机分为接受传统开放或腹腔镜修复。主要终点是术后住院天数。次要终点包括 QoL、并发症和复发。患者随访至少 5 年。
共招募了 102 名患者并进行了随机分组。共有 88 名患者接受了手术,并纳入意向治疗分析(开放组 44 例,腹腔镜组 44 例)。平均年龄为 59.5 岁,性别比例相等,BMI 为 28.8kg/m。在计划外的中期分析后,由于无效性,试验提前结束,该分析表明需要拒绝假设。主要结局无差异:开放组住院时间为 3 天(范围 1-36 天),腹腔镜组为 3 天(范围 1-12 天)(p=0.481)。短期和长期 QoL 问卷无显著组间差异。开放组满意度降低。总复发率为 19%,其中开放组为 16%,腹腔镜组为 23%(平均随访 6.6 年)(p=0.25)。
在一项随机对照试验中,腹腔镜切口疝修补术后的短期和长期结果并不优于开放手术。持续较高的复发率、降低的 QoL 和不理想的满意度需要在术前过程中对患者的期望进行管理,并进行个体化的手术管理。
荷兰试验注册 NTR2808。