Reynolds Matthew R, Essebag Vidal, Zimetbaum Peter, Cohen David J
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Division of Cardiology, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007 Jun;18(6):628-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00819.x. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
Drivers of cost in the atrial fibrillation (AF) population are not fully understood. We sought to characterize the resource utilization and costs of treating new-onset AF, with emphasis on the incremental costs associated with recurrent episodes of AF over time.
An inception cohort of 973 AF patients was followed at 3-6 month intervals in an observational registry over a mean of 24 +/- 9 months. AF therapies, clinical outcomes, and both inpatient and outpatient medical resource utilization were tracked at each follow-up interval. Registry patients were managed primarily with cardioversion and pharmacological therapy. Direct healthcare costs were calculated from a U.S. perspective by multiplying measures of resource utilization by representative price weights. Costs were compared among patients in whom the initial episode of AF became permanent and patients who initially achieved sinus rhythm and had either 0, 1-2, or > or = 3 documented recurrences during follow-up. Mean annual costs for these four groups were $2,372, $3,385, $6,331, and $10,312 per patient per year, respectively (P < 0.001 for trend), with the largest variation related to hospital costs. In multivariable analysis controlling for demographic characteristics and baseline cardiac and comorbid conditions, each documented recurrence of AF was found to increase annual healthcare costs by approximately $1,600.
Following initial diagnosis, patients with AF treated with traditional therapies incur $4,000-$5,000 in annual direct healthcare costs. Costs are markedly higher in patients with multiple AF recurrences. These data may be helpful in evaluating the economic impact of new technologies for treating AF.
心房颤动(AF)人群的成本驱动因素尚未完全明确。我们试图描述新发房颤治疗的资源利用和成本情况,重点关注随着时间推移房颤复发相关的增量成本。
在一个观察性登记处,对973例房颤患者的起始队列进行了为期平均24±9个月、每隔3至6个月的随访。在每次随访间隔中跟踪房颤治疗、临床结局以及住院和门诊医疗资源利用情况。登记处的患者主要采用复律和药物治疗。从美国视角,通过将资源利用指标乘以代表性价格权重来计算直接医疗成本。对房颤首发变为永久性房颤的患者以及最初实现窦性心律且在随访期间有0次、1 - 2次或≥3次记录复发的患者的成本进行了比较。这四组患者的年均成本分别为每位患者每年2372美元、3385美元、6331美元和10312美元(趋势P < 0.001),最大差异与住院成本相关。在控制人口统计学特征以及基线心脏和合并症情况的多变量分析中,发现房颤每次记录的复发会使年度医疗成本增加约1600美元。
初始诊断后,接受传统治疗的房颤患者每年产生4000 - 5000美元的直接医疗成本。房颤多次复发的患者成本明显更高。这些数据可能有助于评估治疗房颤新技术的经济影响。