Why most published research findings are false: problems in the analysis.
作者信息
Goodman Steven, Greenland Sander
出版信息
PLoS Med. 2007 Apr;4(4):e168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040168.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Why most published research findings are false: problems in the analysis.为何大多数已发表的研究发现是错误的：分析中的问题。
PLoS Med. 2007 Apr;4(4):e168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040168.
2
Error message.错误消息。
Nature. 2004 Apr 22;428(6985):799. doi: 10.1038/428799c.
3
Double check casts doubt on statistics in published papers.再次核查对已发表论文中的统计数据提出了质疑。
Nature. 2004 Jun 3;429(6991):490. doi: 10.1038/429490a.
4
Clinical research design and reporting: always room for improvement!临床研究设计与报告：总有改进的空间！
Transfusion. 2007 Jan;47(1):2-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01085.x.
5
Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society.美国生理学会出版期刊中统计数据报告指南。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2004 Dec;28(1-4):85-7. doi: 10.1152/advan.00019.2004.
6
How to ensure your paper is rejected by the statistical reviewer.如何确保你的论文被统计审稿人拒稿。
Diabet Med. 2005 Apr;22(4):371-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01443.x.
7
Why most published research findings are false: author's reply to Goodman and Greenland.为何大多数已发表的研究发现是错误的：作者对古德曼和格林兰的回应
PLoS Med. 2007 Jun;4(6):e215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040215.
8
Making sure corrections don't vanish online.确保修改内容不会在网上消失。
Nature. 2005 Mar 3;434(7029):18; discussion 18. doi: 10.1038/434018c.
9
Guidelines for reporting health care research: advancing the clarity and transparency of scientific reporting.医疗保健研究报告指南：提高科学报告的清晰度和透明度。
Can J Anaesth. 2009 Feb;56(2):96-101. doi: 10.1007/s12630-008-9027-0.
10
Providing the best for our patients: evidence-based practice.为我们的患者提供最佳治疗：循证医学实践。
Nurse Pract. 2001 Mar;26(3):11-2, 15.
引用本文的文献
1
The horizontal ladder test (HLT) protocol: a novel, optimized, and reliable means of assessing motor coordination in .水平阶梯试验（HLT）方案：一种评估……运动协调性的新颖、优化且可靠的方法
Front Behav Neurosci. 2024 Mar 6;18:1357363. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1357363. eCollection 2024.
2
The Horizontal Ladder Test (HLT) protocol: A novel, optimized, and reliable means of assessing motor coordination in .水平阶梯试验（HLT）方案：一种评估……运动协调性的新颖、优化且可靠的方法 。 （原文句末不完整）
bioRxiv. 2023 Dec 15:2023.12.13.571517. doi: 10.1101/2023.12.13.571517.
3
Reconsidering evidence-based management of endometriosis.重新审视子宫内膜异位症的循证管理
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2022 Sep;14(3):225-233. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.14.3.033.
4
False and true positives in arthropod thermal adaptation candidate gene lists.节肢动物热适应候选基因列表中的假阳性和真阳性。
Genetica. 2021 Jun;149(3):143-153. doi: 10.1007/s10709-021-00122-w. Epub 2021 May 7.
5
The replication crisis in epidemiology: snowball, snow job, or winter solstice?流行病学中的复制危机：滚雪球、骗局还是冬至？
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2018 Jun;5(2):175-183. doi: 10.1007/s40471-018-0148-x. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
6
Microbial involvement in Alzheimer disease development and progression.微生物与阿尔茨海默病发生发展的关系
Mol Neurodegener. 2020 Jul 24;15(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13024-020-00378-4.
7
Statistical significance: p value, 0.05 threshold, and applications to radiomics-reasons for a conservative approach.统计学意义：p 值、0.05 阈值及在放射组学中的应用——为什么要采取保守的方法。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2020 Mar 11;4(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s41747-020-0145-y.
8
Comparative effectiveness of secukinumab and etanercept in biologic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis assessed by matching-adjusted indirect comparison.通过匹配调整间接比较评估司库奇尤单抗和依那西普在初治银屑病关节炎患者中的相对疗效。
Eur J Rheumatol. 2018 Jul 1;6(3):113-121. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.19057. Print 2019 Jul.
9
A theory and methodology to quantify knowledge.一种量化知识的理论与方法。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Apr 3;6(4):181055. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181055. eCollection 2019 Apr.
10
Comparative effectiveness of secukinumab and adalimumab in ankylosing spondylitis as assessed by matching-adjusted indirect comparison.通过匹配调整间接比较评估司库奇尤单抗和阿达木单抗在强直性脊柱炎中的相对疗效。
Eur J Rheumatol. 2018 Dec;5(4):216-223. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2018.18162. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
本文引用的文献
1
Why most published research findings are false.为何大多数已发表的研究结果是错误的。
PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. Epub 2005 Aug 30.
Zotero 插件