Moulton Lawrence H, Golub Jonathan E, Durovni Betina, Cavalcante Solange C, Pacheco Antonio G, Saraceni Valeria, King Bonnie, Chaisson Richard E
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 20912, USA.
Clin Trials. 2007;4(2):190-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774507076937.
Tuberculosis (TB) is a major public health problem in Rio de Janeiro, where a high proportion of HIV-infected adults are co-infected with latent TB. Health officials in Brazil have recommended that HIV patients be tested for TB infection and given TB prophylaxis (isoniazid) if positive. In practice, although Brazil is a model for provision of antiretroviral therapy to patients with advanced HIV disease, relatively few such patients receive TB testing and prevention services.
We initiated a randomized study of a health services intervention to train health personnel in implementation of the recommended routine of TB testing and isoniazid prophylaxis. The primary goal is to reduce incident TB disease in the HIV clinic population.
The clinic-level intervention will be phased in gradually over the study period until all clinics have received the intervention. The clinics' order of initiation of intervention was randomized and subjected to constraints based on clinic-level covariates. This phased intervention cluster-randomized trial required special attention to power/sample size calculation and randomization procedures, of which we provide the relevant details.
Special design considerations accounted for within-clinic correlation, variation in the clinic size, time-varying ratio of intervention to control clinics and guaranteed post-randomization covariate balance. These were successfully implemented for the estimation of power and execution of the randomization strategy.
Although the design features of randomization by clinic and phased implementation of the intervention meet logistic and local needs, they substantially lower the statistical power of the study.
Studies with cluster-randomized order of intervention introduction can provide useful information on intervention effects. Their design and analysis are more complicated than for individually randomized parallel design trials. The methods we describe represent practical approaches to the challenges raised in the course of designing this study.
结核病是里约热内卢的一个主要公共卫生问题,在那里,很大一部分感染艾滋病毒的成年人同时感染了潜伏性结核病。巴西卫生官员建议对艾滋病毒患者进行结核病感染检测,若检测呈阳性,则给予结核病预防治疗(异烟肼)。实际上,尽管巴西是为晚期艾滋病毒疾病患者提供抗逆转录病毒治疗的典范,但相对较少的此类患者接受结核病检测和预防服务。
我们启动了一项关于卫生服务干预的随机研究,以培训卫生人员实施推荐的结核病检测和异烟肼预防常规流程。主要目标是减少艾滋病毒诊所人群中结核病的发病。
在研究期间,诊所层面的干预将逐步实施,直至所有诊所都接受干预。干预启动的诊所顺序是随机的,并根据诊所层面的协变量进行限制。这项分阶段干预的整群随机试验需要特别关注功效/样本量计算和随机化程序,我们提供了相关细节。
特殊的设计考虑因素包括诊所内相关性、诊所规模的差异、干预诊所与对照诊所随时间变化的比例以及确保随机化后协变量平衡。这些因素在功效估计和随机化策略执行中得到了成功实施。
尽管按诊所进行随机化以及分阶段实施干预的设计特点满足了后勤和当地需求,但它们大大降低了研究的统计功效。
采用整群随机顺序引入干预的研究可以提供有关干预效果的有用信息。它们的设计和分析比个体随机平行设计试验更为复杂。我们描述的方法代表了应对本研究设计过程中提出的挑战的实用方法。