• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

混合效应模型在阶梯式楔形群随机临床试验设计和分析中的应用概述。

Mixed-effects models for the design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: An overview.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.

Center for Methods in Implementation and Preventive Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):612-639. doi: 10.1177/0962280220932962. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1177/0962280220932962
PMID:32631142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7785651/
Abstract

The stepped wedge cluster randomized design has received increasing attention in pragmatic clinical trials and implementation science research. The key feature of the design is the unidirectional crossover of clusters from the control to intervention conditions on a staggered schedule, which induces confounding of the intervention effect by time. The stepped wedge design first appeared in the Gambia hepatitis study in the 1980s. However, the statistical model used for the design and analysis was not formally introduced until 2007 in an article by Hussey and Hughes. Since then, a variety of mixed-effects model extensions have been proposed for the design and analysis of these trials. In this article, we explore these extensions under a unified perspective. We provide a general model representation and regard various model extensions as alternative ways to characterize the secular trend, intervention effect, as well as sources of heterogeneity. We review the key model ingredients and clarify their implications for the design and analysis. The article serves as an entry point to the evolving statistical literatures on stepped wedge designs.

摘要

阶梯式楔形群随机设计在实用临床试验和实施科学研究中受到越来越多的关注。该设计的主要特点是在交错的时间安排上,从对照条件到干预条件的单向群集交叉,从而导致干预效果的混杂。该设计最早出现在 20 世纪 80 年代的冈比亚肝炎研究中。然而,直到 2007 年,Hussey 和 Hughes 在一篇文章中才正式介绍了该设计和分析所使用的统计模型。从那时起,已经提出了各种混合效应模型扩展,用于这些试验的设计和分析。在本文中,我们从统一的角度探讨了这些扩展。我们提供了一个通用的模型表示,并将各种模型扩展视为描述季节性趋势、干预效果以及异质性来源的替代方法。我们回顾了关键的模型成分,并阐明了它们对设计和分析的影响。本文是对阶梯式楔形设计不断发展的统计文献的一个入门。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc79/8008430/ac6e20b06046/10.1177_0962280220932962-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc79/8008430/b45c54da0ac3/10.1177_0962280220932962-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc79/8008430/caa71961a062/10.1177_0962280220932962-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc79/8008430/ac6e20b06046/10.1177_0962280220932962-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc79/8008430/b45c54da0ac3/10.1177_0962280220932962-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc79/8008430/caa71961a062/10.1177_0962280220932962-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc79/8008430/ac6e20b06046/10.1177_0962280220932962-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Mixed-effects models for the design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: An overview.混合效应模型在阶梯式楔形群随机临床试验设计和分析中的应用概述。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):612-639. doi: 10.1177/0962280220932962. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
2
3
A review of current practice in the design and analysis of extremely small stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials.关于极小阶梯楔形整群随机试验设计与分析的当前实践综述。
Clin Trials. 2025 Feb;22(1):45-56. doi: 10.1177/17407745241276137. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
4
Optimal designs using generalized estimating equations in cluster randomized crossover and stepped wedge trials.使用广义估计方程的最优设计在群组随机交叉和阶梯楔形试验中。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Aug;33(8):1299-1330. doi: 10.1177/09622802241247717. Epub 2024 May 30.
5
Stepped wedge designs: insights from a design of experiments perspective.阶梯楔形设计:从实验设计角度的见解
Stat Med. 2017 Oct 30;36(24):3772-3790. doi: 10.1002/sim.7403. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
6
Analysis of cluster randomised stepped wedge trials with repeated cross-sectional samples.对采用重复横断面样本的整群随机阶梯楔形试验的分析。
Trials. 2017 Mar 4;18(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1833-7.
7
Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials: A Methodological Overview.阶梯式楔形群随机临床试验:方法概述。
World Neurosurg. 2022 May;161:323-330. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.136.
8
Reconsidering stepped wedge cluster randomized trial designs with implementation periods: Fewer sequences or the parallel-group design with baseline and implementation periods are potentially more efficient.重新考虑具有实施阶段的阶梯型楔形集群随机试验设计:减少序列或具有基线和实施阶段的平行组设计可能更有效。
Clin Trials. 2024 Dec;21(6):710-722. doi: 10.1177/17407745241244790. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
9
Five questions to consider before conducting a stepped wedge trial.在进行阶梯楔形试验之前需要考虑的五个问题。
Trials. 2015 Aug 17;16:350. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0841-8.
10
A practical Bayesian stepped wedge design for community-based cluster-randomized clinical trials: The British Columbia Telehealth Trial.一种用于基于社区的整群随机临床试验的实用贝叶斯阶梯楔形设计:不列颠哥伦比亚远程医疗试验
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):641-650. doi: 10.1177/1740774516656583. Epub 2016 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiopulmonary Point-of-Care Ultrasonography for Hospitalist Management of Undifferentiated Dyspnea.用于住院医师对未分化呼吸困难进行管理的心肺床旁超声检查
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2530677. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.30677.
2
RANDOMIZATION INFERENCE FOR CLUSTER-RANDOMIZED TEST-NEGATIVE DESIGNS WITH APPLICATION TO DENGUE STUDIES: UNBIASED ESTIMATION, PARTIAL COMPLIANCE, AND STEPPED-WEDGE DESIGN.用于登革热研究的整群随机试验阴性设计的随机化推断:无偏估计、部分依从性和阶梯楔形设计
Ann Appl Stat. 2023 Jun;17(2):1592-1614. doi: 10.1214/22-aoas1684. Epub 2023 May 1.
3
Power calculation for cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a time-to-event endpoint.

本文引用的文献

1
A simulation study of statistical approaches to data analysis in the stepped wedge design.阶梯楔形设计中数据分析统计方法的模拟研究
Stat Biosci. 2020 Dec;12(3):399-415. doi: 10.1007/s12561-019-09259-x. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
2
Commentary: Right truncation in cluster randomized trials can attenuate the power of a marginal analysis.评论:整群随机试验中的右侧截尾可能会削弱边际分析的功效。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Jun 1;49(3):964-967. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa037.
3
Sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials.
具有事件发生时间终点的横断面阶梯楔形整群随机试验的功效计算。
Biometrics. 2025 Apr 2;81(2). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujaf074.
4
Peer and Patient Feedback to Increase Adherence to Postoperative Opioid Prescribing Guidelines: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.同伴及患者反馈以提高术后阿片类药物处方指南的依从性:一项阶梯楔形整群随机临床试验
JAMA Surg. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1672.
5
Peer support enhanced behavioural crisis response teams in the emergency department: protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial.急诊科同伴支持强化行为危机应对团队:阶梯式楔形整群随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 8;15(6):e103775. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103775.
6
Inference for the treatment effect in staircase designs with continuous outcomes: a simulation study.连续结果阶梯设计中治疗效果的推断:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 May 10;25(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02567-5.
7
Identifying Less Burdensome and More Cost-Efficient Incomplete Stepped Wedge Designs for Continuous Outcomes Collected via Repeated Cross-Sections.为通过重复横断面收集的连续结局识别负担较小且成本效益更高的不完全阶梯楔形设计。
Stat Med. 2025 Apr;44(8-9):e70067. doi: 10.1002/sim.70067.
8
Power analysis for concurrent balanced or imbalanced multiple-intervention stepped wedge design: a simulation-based approach.并发平衡或不平衡多干预阶梯楔形设计的功效分析:一种基于模拟的方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02546-w.
9
Study protocol for a stepped-wedge, randomized controlled trial to evaluate implementation of a suicide risk identification model among behavioral health patients in three large health systems.一项阶梯楔形随机对照试验的研究方案,旨在评估在三个大型医疗系统的行为健康患者中实施自杀风险识别模型的情况。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 8;25(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06760-0.
10
Nudging Clinicians to Promote Serious Illness Communication for Critically Ill Patients: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.引导临床医生促进重症患者的严重疾病沟通:一项实用的整群随机试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 May 1;185(5):510-520. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0090.
开放队列纵向整群随机试验的样本量和效能计算
Stat Med. 2020 Mar 4;39(13):1871-83. doi: 10.1002/sim.8519.
4
Novel methods for the analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.阶梯式楔形群随机试验分析的新方法。
Stat Med. 2020 Mar 30;39(7):815-844. doi: 10.1002/sim.8451. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
5
Essential Ingredients and Innovations in the Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials.群组随机试验设计与分析的基本要素和创新。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41:1-19. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094027. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
6
Design and analysis considerations for cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a decay correlation structure.具有衰减相关结构的队列逐步楔形整群随机试验的设计与分析考量
Stat Med. 2020 Feb 20;39(4):438-455. doi: 10.1002/sim.8415. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
7
Power calculation for cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with variable cluster sizes.具有变群大小的横断 stepped wedge 群随机试验的功效计算。
Biometrics. 2020 Sep;76(3):951-962. doi: 10.1111/biom.13164. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
8
Information content of stepped-wedge designs when treatment effect heterogeneity and/or implementation periods are present.存在治疗效果异质性和/或实施期时的阶乘设计的信息含量。
Stat Med. 2019 Oct 15;38(23):4686-4701. doi: 10.1002/sim.8327. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
9
Properties and pitfalls of weighting as an alternative to multilevel multiple imputation in cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness.在协变量相关缺失下缺失二分类结局的群组随机试验中,加权作为多水平多重插补替代方法的性质和陷阱。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 May;29(5):1338-1353. doi: 10.1177/0962280219859915. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
10
Stepped wedge trials with continuous recruitment require new ways of thinking.阶梯式随机临床试验具有连续性招募的特点,这需要新的思路。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Dec;116:161-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.037. Epub 2019 Jun 11.