Recker Mario, Pybus Oliver G, Nee Sean, Gupta Sunetra
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 1;104(18):7711-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702154104. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
It is commonly believed that influenza epidemics arise through the incremental accumulation of viral mutations, culminating in a novel antigenic type that is able to escape host immunity. Successive epidemic strains therefore become increasingly antigenically distant from a founding strain. Here, we present an alternative explanation where, because of functional constraints on the defining epitopes, the virus population is characterized by a limited set of antigenic types, all of which may be continuously generated by mutation from preexisting strains and other processes. Under these circumstances, influenza outbreaks arise as a consequence of host immune selection in a manner that is independent of the mode and tempo of viral mutation. By contrast with existing paradigms, antigenic distance between epidemic strains does not necessarily accumulate with time in our model, and it is the changing profile of host population immunity that creates the conditions for the emergence of the next influenza strain rather than the mutational capabilities of the virus.
人们普遍认为,流感流行是通过病毒突变的逐步积累而产生的,最终形成一种能够逃避宿主免疫的新型抗原类型。因此, successive epidemic strains与原始毒株在抗原性上的差异越来越大。在这里,我们提出一种不同的解释,由于定义表位的功能限制,病毒群体具有一组有限的抗原类型,所有这些类型都可能通过现有毒株的突变和其他过程不断产生。在这种情况下,流感爆发是宿主免疫选择的结果,其方式与病毒突变的模式和速度无关。与现有范式不同,在我们的模型中,流行毒株之间的抗原距离不一定随时间积累,是宿主群体免疫状况的变化为下一种流感毒株的出现创造了条件,而不是病毒的突变能力。 (注:原文中“successive epidemic strains”未翻译完整,这里推测可能是“连续的流行毒株”之类的意思,具体需结合完整语境进一步确定准确含义。)