Matsuno Osamu, Okubo Toshiyuki, Hiroshige Shigeo, Takenaka Rhyuichi, Ono Emiko, Ueno Takuya, Nureki Shinichi, Ando Masaru, Miyazaki Eishi, Kumamoto Toshihide
Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Brain and Nerve, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Japan.
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2007 May;212(1):49-53. doi: 10.1620/tjem.212.49.
Diagnosis of drug-induced pneumonia, which represents pulmonary toxicity caused by certain drugs, is difficult, as a large number of different drugs can elicit various immune-mediated diseases with distinct pathomechanisms. The drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) is widely used for diagnosing drug-induced pneumonia in Japan. Recent reports, however, indicate that DLST is not reliable for diagnosis of drug-induced pneumonia. To diagnose drug-induced pneumonia, a provocation test with the suspected drug is the most reliable method of assessing the relationship between the drug and pneumonia. We examined the correlation between the DLST and the provocation test in 6 cases of suspected drug-induced pneumonia. DLST was performed in all of the patients. The causes of pneumonia in all patients were confirmed by a provocation test. The DLST was positive in 3 of 6 cases of suspected drug-induced pneumonia, but the suspected drugs were ruled out by the provocation test. If we had relied solely on the DLST, these 3 cases would have been labeled as false allergy. The results of the DLST did not coincide with the results of the provocation test in any of the cases. Our results suggest that the DLST is not useful for the diagnosis of drug-induced pneumonia. Following provocation with the causative drug, reappearance of pulmonary infiltration was not observed in any of the cases. These findings indicate that a carefully performed provocation test is the safe and most reliable method.
药物性肺炎是由某些药物引起的肺部毒性反应,其诊断较为困难,因为大量不同药物可引发具有不同病理机制的各种免疫介导疾病。在日本,药物诱导淋巴细胞刺激试验(DLST)被广泛用于诊断药物性肺炎。然而,最近的报告表明,DLST对于药物性肺炎的诊断并不可靠。对于药物性肺炎的诊断,使用可疑药物进行激发试验是评估药物与肺炎之间关系的最可靠方法。我们检查了6例疑似药物性肺炎患者的DLST与激发试验之间的相关性。所有患者均进行了DLST。所有患者肺炎的病因均通过激发试验得以证实。6例疑似药物性肺炎患者中有3例DLST呈阳性,但激发试验排除了可疑药物。如果我们仅依赖DLST,这3例患者将会被判定为假过敏。在任何病例中,DLST的结果均与激发试验的结果不一致。我们的结果表明,DLST对药物性肺炎的诊断并无用处。在使用致病药物进行激发试验后,所有病例均未观察到肺部浸润再次出现。这些发现表明,精心实施的激发试验是安全且最可靠的方法。