三 P 积极育儿项目是否物有所值？
Does the triple P-Positive Parenting Program provide value for money?
作者信息
Mihalopoulos Cathrine, Sanders Matthew R, Turner Karen M T, Murphy-Brennan Majella, Carter Rob
机构信息
Program Evaluation Unit, School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.
出版信息
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007 Mar;41(3):239-46. doi: 10.1080/00048670601172723.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the present study was to investigate the economic case for the implementation of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program on a population basis in Queensland, Australia, in order to reduce the prevalence of conduct disorder in children.
METHOD
Threshold analysis was undertaken together with a limited cost-effectiveness analysis.
RESULTS
The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program is a dominant intervention; that is, it costs less than the amount it saves, until the reduction in prevalence falls below 7% where net costs become positive.
CONCLUSIONS
Triple P is likely to be a worthwhile use of limited health funds. The economic case is promising, but further research is required to confirm the study results.
目的
本研究旨在调查在澳大利亚昆士兰州针对全体人群实施“积极育儿计划（Triple P）”以降低儿童品行障碍患病率的经济学依据。
方法
进行了阈值分析以及有限的成本效益分析。
结果
“积极育儿计划（Triple P）”是一种占优干预措施；也就是说，在患病率降低幅度低于7%致使净成本变为正值之前，其成本低于节省的金额。
结论
“积极育儿计划（Triple P）”很可能是有限卫生资金的一项值得投入的用途。经济学依据很有前景，但需要进一步研究来证实研究结果。
Zotero 插件