Purcell David W, Garfein Richard S, Latka Mary H, Thiede Hanne, Hudson Sharon, Bonner Sebastian, Golub Elizabeth T, Ouellet Lawrence J
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, MS E-37, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Nov;91 Suppl 1:S73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.03.004. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
Young injection drug users (IDUs) who are not infected with HIV or hepatitis C virus are at great risk of acquiring one or both of these infections through their sexual or injection behaviors. We describe the development of a behavioral intervention designed to decrease sexual and injection risk behaviors among young IDUs. The intervention was developed through a dynamic and iterative process that involved extensive development activities, focus groups with the target population to pilot individual activities and intervention sessions, and later, pilot testing of the entire intervention. The six-session intervention that emerged from the development process relied on both social-cognitive theories and peer influence models. We also designed a control intervention, trained facilitators to deliver the interventions, and conducted quality assurance of intervention delivery. To better understand intervention trial findings, we asked participants about their intervention experiences and examined potential contamination across arms. Both interventions were delivered with high fidelity and participants in both groups reported positive experiences. More perceived impact was reported for injection risk behaviors than for sexual risk behaviors among participants in the intervention arm. Minimal evidence of contamination was found. Lessons learned can help future researchers to develop stronger interventions for this high-need population.
未感染艾滋病毒或丙型肝炎病毒的年轻注射吸毒者,通过其性行为或注射行为感染这两种病毒中的一种或两种的风险很大。我们描述了一种行为干预措施的开发过程,该措施旨在减少年轻注射吸毒者的性风险行为和注射风险行为。该干预措施是通过一个动态的迭代过程开发的,其中包括广泛的开发活动、与目标人群进行焦点小组讨论以试点个别活动和干预课程,以及随后对整个干预措施进行试点测试。从开发过程中产生的六节干预课程既依赖于社会认知理论,也依赖于同伴影响模型。我们还设计了一种对照干预措施,培训了实施干预措施的促进者,并对干预措施的实施进行了质量保证。为了更好地理解干预试验的结果,我们询问了参与者他们的干预经历,并检查了各分组之间潜在的交叉影响。两种干预措施都得到了高度忠实的实施,两组参与者都报告了积极的体验。与干预组参与者的性风险行为相比,他们报告的注射风险行为受到的影响更大。发现交叉影响的证据很少。吸取的经验教训有助于未来的研究人员为这一高需求人群开发更有效的干预措施。