Mezzana P, Anniboletti T, Curinga G, Onesti M G
Department of Dermatology and Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Italy.
Acta Chir Plast. 2007;49(1):21-6.
In the clinical field, reproducible and comparable assessments of skin color are needed for objective evaluation of lesions and efficacy of treatments. In order to provide objective, quantitative color information in skin lesions, devices such as reflectance spectrophotometer and reflectance colorimeter have been successfully used during the past decade, though they are too expensive and technically complex to be handled in routine clinical situations. Reflectance skin color measurements require direct contact of the probe with the skin, and the compression significantly influences readings. Color measurements obtained from digitized images have been proposed as a simple and cost-effective way to evaluate skin color and promote efficacy of treatments. The disadvantage is its direct and close relation to the ambient light: even if an accurate control of subject illumination is provided, readings vary between different laboratories. We propose a standard system for computerized color image analysis of skin erythrosis modification after Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) treatments, making it possible to compare readings taken by different observers in different environmental light conditions. The goal of our study is the introduction of fixed color internal controls in digital imaging in order to calculate a normalization factor of measurements, resulting not in a method of absolute quantification of erythema or erythrosis but in a method that provides the possibility of translation and comparison of the red values between systems in different environmental conditions. Between December 2004 and May 2005 we evaluated 30 patients at the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at the University "La Sapienza" of Rome. Three points of standard colored paper (Red Green Blue) were applied with a plastic pattern (standard intersection lines) and white point in non involved area for skin control. For every patient we took a series of pictures pre-treatment and after a standard cycle of 5/6 IPL. We evaluate the grade of reproducibility of our procedure with a careful analysis of pre-treatment digital images obtained in different environmental conditions. The statistic analysis of the standard deviation between the values of R obtained (using different light conditions), and the respective normalized valor (normalized to the referent image), did not show any significant statistical difference and allows us to achieve our goal: the reproducibility of the results.
在临床领域,为了客观评估皮损及治疗效果,需要对皮肤颜色进行可重复且可比的评估。为了提供皮肤病变的客观、定量颜色信息,过去十年中,反射分光光度计和反射色度计等设备已成功使用,尽管它们过于昂贵且技术复杂,无法在常规临床情况下使用。反射式皮肤颜色测量需要探头与皮肤直接接触,而这种压迫会显著影响读数。从数字化图像获得的颜色测量已被提议作为一种简单且经济高效的方法来评估皮肤颜色并提高治疗效果。其缺点是它与环境光有直接且密切的关系:即使提供了对受试者照明的精确控制,不同实验室的读数仍会有所不同。我们提出了一种用于强脉冲光(IPL)治疗后皮肤红斑变化的计算机化彩色图像分析标准系统,使得在不同环境光条件下不同观察者所获取的读数能够进行比较。我们研究的目标是在数字成像中引入固定颜色的内部对照,以便计算测量的归一化因子,这并非产生一种绝对量化红斑或红变的方法,而是提供一种在不同环境条件下系统之间进行红色值转换和比较的可能性的方法。在2004年12月至2005年5月期间,我们在罗马“La Sapienza”大学整形与重建外科评估了30名患者。使用塑料模板(标准交叉线)和非皮损区域的白点,贴上三个标准颜色纸点(红、绿、蓝)用于皮肤对照。对于每位患者,我们在治疗前和经过5/6次IPL标准疗程后拍摄了一系列照片。我们通过仔细分析在不同环境条件下获得的治疗前数字图像,评估了我们程序的可重复性。对所获得的R值(使用不同光照条件)与各自的归一化值(相对于参考图像进行归一化)之间的标准差进行统计分析,未显示出任何显著的统计学差异,这使我们能够实现目标:结果的可重复性。