• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情境对记忆与知晓的影响:预期启发式

Context effects on remembering and knowing: the expectancy heuristic.

作者信息

McCabe David P, Balota David A

机构信息

Department of PsychologyColorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):536-49. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.536.

DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.536
PMID:17470004
Abstract

Three experiments are reported examining the effect of context on remember-know judgments. In Experiments 1 and 2, medium-frequency words were intermixed with high-frequency or low-frequency words at study or at test, respectively. Remember responses were greater for medium-frequency targets when they were studied or tested among high-frequency, as compared with low-frequency, words. The authors proposed a decision-based mechanism called "the expectancy heuristic" to explain why remember responses were more likely when items were studied or tested in the context of words that were relatively less distinct. According to the expectancy heuristic, when items on a recognition test exceed an expected level of memorability they will be given a remember judgment but when they do not, but are still more familiar than new words, they will be given a know judgment. Experiment 3, which varied expectancies about the strength of tested targets, demonstrated the use of the expectancy heuristic, indicating that it operates by selectively influencing the remember criterion rather than by influencing recollection of studied items.

摘要

本文报告了三项实验,研究情境对“记得-知道”判断的影响。在实验1和实验2中,中频词分别在学习时或测试时与高频词或低频词混合呈现。与在低频词中学习或测试相比,中频目标词在高频词中学习或测试时,“记得”反应更多。作者提出了一种基于决策的机制,称为“预期启发式”,以解释为什么当项目在相对不那么突出的词的情境中学习或测试时,“记得”反应更有可能出现。根据预期启发式,当识别测试中的项目超过预期的记忆水平时,它们将被判定为“记得”,但当它们没有超过预期水平,但仍然比新词更熟悉时,它们将被判定为“知道”。实验3改变了对测试目标强度的预期,证明了预期启发式的作用,表明它通过选择性地影响“记得”标准来运作,而不是通过影响所学项目的回忆。

相似文献

1
Context effects on remembering and knowing: the expectancy heuristic.情境对记忆与知晓的影响:预期启发式
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):536-49. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.536.
2
On interpreting the relationship between remember-know judgments and confidence: the role of instructions.论记忆知晓判断与信心之间关系的解读:指导语的作用
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Sep;18(3):701-9. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.04.010. Epub 2009 May 23.
3
The effects of environmental context on recognition memory and claims of remembering.环境背景对识别记忆及记忆宣称的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1412-29. doi: 10.1037/a0013016.
4
Binding of multidimensional context information as a distinctive characteristic of remember judgments.多维情境信息的绑定作为记忆判断的一个显著特征。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jan;34(1):32-49. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.32.
5
Recognition memory and awareness: A high-frequency advantage in the accuracy of knowing.识别记忆与意识:知晓准确性方面的高频优势。
Memory. 2006 Apr;14(3):265-75. doi: 10.1080/09658210544000051.
6
The influence of instructions and terminology on the accuracy of remember-know judgments.指示与术语对“记得—知道”判断准确性的影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Jun;18(2):401-13. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
7
Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recollection.记忆/知晓判断探究回忆程度。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Mar;20(3):400-5. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20041.
8
On the validity of remember-know judgments: evidence from think aloud protocols.关于再认判断的有效性:来自出声思维报告的证据。
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1625-33. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.012. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
9
Response bias in "remembering" emotional stimuli: a new perspective on age differences.“回忆”情绪性刺激中的反应偏差:关于年龄差异的新视角
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 May;34(3):703-11. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.703.
10
Recognition and frequency judgments in young and elderly adults.年轻人和老年人的识别与频率判断
Am J Psychol. 1986 Spring;99(1):81-102.

引用本文的文献

1
Heuristic responses to pandemic uncertainty: Practicable communication strategies of "reasoned transparency" to aid public reception of changing science.大流行不确定性的启发式应对:“理性透明”的可行沟通策略,以帮助公众接受不断变化的科学。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 May;32(4):428-441. doi: 10.1177/09636625221135425. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
2
Examining the effect of list composition on monitoring and control processes in metamemory.考察列表构成对元记忆监控和控制过程的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Apr;49(3):498-517. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01107-4. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
3
Expectation affects learning and modulates memory experience at retrieval.
期望会影响学习,并在检索时调节记忆体验。
Cognition. 2018 Nov;180:123-134. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
4
Recollection-Based Retrieval Is Influenced by Contextual Variation at Encoding but Not at Retrieval.基于回忆的检索受编码时的情境变化影响,但不受检索时的情境变化影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 2;10(7):e0130403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130403. eCollection 2015.
5
Metacognitive effects of initial question difficulty on subsequent memory performance.初始问题难度对后续记忆表现的元认知效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Oct;21(5):1255-62. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0597-2.
6
Diffusion model drift rates can be influenced by decision processes: an analysis of the strength-based mirror effect.扩散模型漂移率可能受到决策过程的影响:基于强度的镜像效应分析。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Sep;38(5):1137-51. doi: 10.1037/a0028151. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
7
Recognition memory for pictorial material in subclinical depression.亚临床抑郁症患者对图片材料的识别记忆。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Nov;135(3):293-301. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.015. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
8
A direct test of the differentiation mechanism: REM, BCDMEM, and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory.对分化机制的直接测试:快速眼动睡眠、基底前脑内侧视前区以及识别记忆中基于强度的镜像效应。
J Mem Lang. 2010 Jul 1;63(1):18-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.004.
9
Repetition priming across distinct contexts: effects of lexical status, word frequency, and retrieval test.跨不同情境的重复启动:词汇状态、词频及检索测试的影响
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Dec;63(12):2376-98. doi: 10.1080/17470211003687546. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
10
The role of extralist associations in false remembering: a source misattribution account.额外列表关联在错误记忆中的作用:一种源错误归因解释。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Mar;37(2):130-42. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.2.130.