Pollick Amy S, de Waal Frans B M
Living Links, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, 954 North Gatewood Road, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 8;104(19):8184-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702624104. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
The natural communication of apes may hold clues about language origins, especially because apes frequently gesture with limbs and hands, a mode of communication thought to have been the starting point of human language evolution. The present study aimed to contrast brachiomanual gestures with orofacial movements and vocalizations in the natural communication of our closest primate relatives, bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). We tested whether gesture is the more flexible form of communication by measuring the strength of association between signals and specific behavioral contexts, comparing groups of both the same and different ape species. Subjects were two captive bonobo groups, a total of 13 individuals, and two captive chimpanzee groups, a total of 34 individuals. The study distinguished 31 manual gestures and 18 facial/vocal signals. It was found that homologous facial/vocal displays were used very similarly by both ape species, yet the same did not apply to gestures. Both within and between species gesture usage varied enormously. Moreover, bonobos showed greater flexibility in this regard than chimpanzees and were also the only species in which multimodal communication (i.e., combinations of gestures and facial/vocal signals) added to behavioral impact on the recipient.
猿类的自然交流可能蕴含着有关语言起源的线索,特别是因为猿类经常用四肢和手做手势,这种交流方式被认为是人类语言进化的起点。本研究旨在对比我们最亲近的灵长类近亲倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)和黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)在自然交流中手臂手部手势与口面部动作及发声之间的差异。我们通过测量信号与特定行为背景之间的关联强度,比较同一猿类物种组和不同猿类物种组,来测试手势是否是更灵活的交流形式。研究对象为两组圈养的倭黑猩猩,共13只个体,以及两组圈养的黑猩猩,共34只个体。该研究区分出31种手部手势和18种面部/发声信号。研究发现,两种猿类使用同源面部/发声表现的方式非常相似,但手势并非如此。物种内部和物种之间的手势使用差异都非常大。此外,倭黑猩猩在这方面比黑猩猩表现出更大的灵活性,并且也是唯一一种多模态交流(即手势与面部/发声信号的组合)会增强对接收者行为影响的物种。