Wood Andrew J, Ackland Graeme J
School of Physics, SUPA, The University of Edinburgh, James Clerk Maxwell Building, The King's Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh, UK.
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Jul 7;274(1618):1637-42. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0306.
From zebra to starlings, herring and even tadpoles, many creatures move in an organized group. The emergent behaviour arises from simple underlying movement rules, but the evolutionary pressure which favours these rules has not been conclusively identified. Various explanations exist for the advantage to the individual of group formation: reduction of predation risk; increased foraging efficiency or reproductive success. Here, we adopt an individual-based model for group formation and subject it to simulated predation and foraging; the haploid individuals evolve via a genetic algorithm based on their relative success under such pressure. Our work suggests that flock or herd formation is likely to be driven by predator avoidance. Individual fitness in the model is strongly dependent on the presence of other phenotypes, such that two distinct types of evolved group can be produced by the same predation or foraging conditions, each stable against individual mutation. We draw analogies with multiple Nash equilibria theory of iterated games to explain and categorize these behaviours. Our model is sufficient to capture the complex behaviour of dynamic collective groups, yet is flexible enough to manifest evolutionary behaviour.
从斑马到椋鸟、鲱鱼甚至蝌蚪,许多生物都会以有组织的群体形式移动。这种涌现行为源自简单的基本运动规则,但有利于这些规则的进化压力尚未得到最终确定。关于群体形成对个体的好处存在各种解释:降低被捕食风险;提高觅食效率或繁殖成功率。在这里,我们采用基于个体的群体形成模型,并使其接受模拟捕食和觅食;单倍体个体通过基于其在这种压力下的相对成功的遗传算法进化。我们的研究表明,群体形成可能是由躲避捕食者驱动的。模型中的个体适应性强烈依赖于其他表型的存在,以至于相同的捕食或觅食条件可以产生两种不同类型的进化群体,每种群体对个体突变都具有稳定性。我们用重复博弈的多重纳什均衡理论进行类比来解释和分类这些行为。我们的模型足以捕捉动态集体群体的复杂行为,并且足够灵活以表现出进化行为。