• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[流行病学与民事审判]

[Epidemiology and civil trials].

作者信息

Hamajima N

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Gifu University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 1991 Aug;38(8):541-5.

PMID:1747544
Abstract

The role epidemiology in courts has become increasingly important both in the United States and in Japan, especially in the field of product liability. In the United States, attributable risk percent (AR%) is used in civil trials as a measure to judge whether alleged factors caused health disturbances of plaintiffs. Most epidemiologists believe that an AR% of more than 50%, ie, relative risk more than 2, supports causality of alleged factors, because "preponderance of evidence" is regarded as a fundamental legal rule in the United States. In Japan, judges in courts require a more strict standard for proof of facts, which means that a much higher AR% may be needed to convince judges. The role of epidemiologists in courts may be to show a plausible range of AR%, based on design, execution, and analysis of quoted epidemiologic studies. Standards for accepting plaintiffs' allegation should be discussed in the legal framework of Japan.

摘要

在美国和日本,流行病学在法庭上的作用变得越来越重要,尤其是在产品责任领域。在美国,归因危险百分比(AR%)在民事审判中被用作判断所称因素是否导致原告健康问题的一种度量。大多数流行病学家认为,AR%超过50%,即相对危险度超过2,支持所称因素的因果关系,因为“证据优势”在美国被视为一项基本法律规则。在日本,法庭上的法官对事实证明要求更严格的标准,这意味着可能需要更高的AR%才能说服法官。流行病学家在法庭上的作用可能是基于所引用的流行病学研究的设计、实施和分析,展示一个合理的AR%范围。在日本的法律框架内,应该讨论接受原告指控的标准。

相似文献

1
[Epidemiology and civil trials].[流行病学与民事审判]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 1991 Aug;38(8):541-5.
2
[Attributable risk percent under an effect modifier and legal causality].[效应修饰因素和法律因果关系下的归因风险百分比]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 1992 Jun;39(6):302-6.
3
Epidemiology and the law: courts and confidence intervals.流行病学与法律:法庭与置信区间
Am J Public Health. 1991 Dec;81(12):1661-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.12.1661.
4
Notable minimum value of relative risk recognized by Japanese epidemiologists and rule of proof in civil trial: questionnaire survey.日本流行病学家认可的相对风险显著最小值及民事审判中的举证规则:问卷调查
Keio J Med. 1993 Sep;42(3):115-8. doi: 10.2302/kjm.42.115.
5
The use of epidemiologic data in the courts.
Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Aug;120(2):190-202. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113881.
6
["Karoshi" and causal relationships].["过劳死”与因果关系]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 1992 Aug;39(8):445-8.
7
Preconception tort liability: recognizing a strict liability cause of action for DES grandchildren.孕前侵权责任:承认针对己烯雌酚(DES)孙辈的严格责任诉讼理由。
Am J Law Med. 1991;17(4):435-55.
8
Theories of recovery for DES damage. Is tort liability the answer?DES损害的恢复理论。侵权责任是答案吗?
J Leg Med. 1983 Jun;4(2):167-200. doi: 10.1080/01947648309513380.
9
Comment: litigation involving manufacturers' liability for defective medical products: judicial perspectives.
Am J Law Med. 1976;2(2):245-55.
10
Factual causation in medical negligence.医疗过失中的事实因果关系。
J Law Med. 2007 Dec;15(3):337-55.