• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃癌根治性胃切除术后肿瘤标志物的假阳性结果。

False-positive findings for tumor markers after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

作者信息

Ohtsuka Takao, Sato Seiji, Kitajima Yoshihiko, Tanaka Masayuki, Nakafusa Yuji, Miyazaki Kohji

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Saga University Faculty of Medicine, Saga, Japan.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2008 Jan;53(1):73-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-9825-1. Epub 2007 May 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-007-9825-1
PMID:17476595
Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the frequency and characteristics of false-positive results for tumor markers after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Carcinoembryonic antigen and/or carbohydrate antigen 19-9 were periodically assessed for 168 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy. Cancer recurrence was observed for 17 (10.1%) patients and 151 (89.9%) were disease-free during the mean follow-up period of 23.1 months after the operation. The frequency of false-positive findings for tumor markers after gastrectomy was 14.3% (24/168) for all followed-up patients. Three different patterns of marker elevation were observed in the false-positive group. A false-positive finding for these markers was observed for patients with early-stage cancer and for those with chronic benign diseases, for example bronchitis, liver dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, and renal dysfunction. For most patients with false-positive findings for a marker a spontaneous decrease in the tumor marker was observed 1-2 months after the marker was first observed at a high level after the operation. Surgeons and oncologists should therefore keep in mind the high frequency of false-positive findings for tumor markers after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估胃癌根治性胃切除术后肿瘤标志物假阳性结果的频率及特征。对168例行根治性胃切除术的患者定期检测癌胚抗原和/或糖类抗原19-9。在术后平均23.1个月的随访期内,17例(10.1%)患者出现癌症复发,151例(89.9%)患者无疾病复发。在所有随访患者中,胃切除术后肿瘤标志物假阳性结果的频率为14.3%(24/168)。在假阳性组中观察到三种不同的标志物升高模式。早期癌症患者以及患有慢性良性疾病(如支气管炎、肝功能不全、糖尿病和肾功能不全)的患者出现了这些标志物的假阳性结果。对于大多数标志物出现假阳性结果的患者,在术后首次观察到标志物处于高水平后的1-2个月,肿瘤标志物出现了自发下降。因此,外科医生和肿瘤学家应牢记胃癌根治性胃切除术后肿瘤标志物假阳性结果的高频率。

相似文献

1
False-positive findings for tumor markers after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.胃癌根治性胃切除术后肿瘤标志物的假阳性结果。
Dig Dis Sci. 2008 Jan;53(1):73-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-9825-1. Epub 2007 May 3.
2
Different roles of tumor marker monitoring after curative resections of gastric and colorectal cancers.胃癌和结直肠癌根治术后肿瘤标志物监测的不同作用。
Dig Dis Sci. 2008 Jun;53(6):1537-43. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-0046-4.
3
The role of gastric distention in differentiating recurrent tumor from physiologic uptake in the remnant stomach on 18F-FDG PET.胃扩张在18F-FDG PET上鉴别残胃复发性肿瘤与生理性摄取中的作用。
J Nucl Med. 2005 Jun;46(6):953-7.
4
Prognostic value of early postoperative tumor marker response in gastric cancer.胃癌患者术后早期肿瘤标志物反应的预后价值。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Nov;20(12):3905-11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3066-7. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
5
Follow-up after curative resection for gastric cancer: Is it time to tailor it?胃癌根治性切除术后的随访:是否到了个体化治疗的时代?
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 May 21;23(19):3379-3387. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i19.3379.
6
Combined epithelial-mesenchymal transition with cancer stem cell-like marker as predictors of recurrence after radical resection for gastric cancer.联合上皮-间质转化与癌症干细胞样标志物作为胃癌根治性切除术后复发的预测指标。
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec 2;12:368. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-368.
7
Role of serum tumor markers in monitoring for recurrence of gastric cancer following radical gastrectomy.血清肿瘤标志物在胃癌根治术后复发监测中的作用。
Dig Dis Sci. 2006 Nov;51(11):2081-6. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-9166-5. Epub 2006 Sep 29.
8
The relationships between perioperative CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 and recurrence in gastric cancer patients after curative radical gastrectomy.胃癌患者根治性胃切除术后围手术期 CEA、CA19-9 和 CA72-4 与复发的关系。
J Surg Oncol. 2011 Nov 1;104(6):585-91. doi: 10.1002/jso.21919. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
9
Elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, a marker of advanced stage gastric cancer and postgastrectomy disease recurrence.高敏 C 反应蛋白升高,提示晚期胃癌和胃癌术后疾病复发。
J Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar 15;105(4):405-9. doi: 10.1002/jso.22129. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
10
Suture granuloma with false-positive finding on PET/CT after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015 Nov;8(4):457-60. doi: 10.1111/ases.12206.

引用本文的文献

1
Current and evolving practices of carbohydrate antigens in gastric cancer: a narrative review.胃癌中碳水化合物抗原的当前及不断发展的实践:一项叙述性综述
Transl Cancer Res. 2025 Jun 30;14(6):3860-3873. doi: 10.21037/tcr-2024-2361. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
Biomarker Panel for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.用于诊断胰腺导管腺癌的生物标志物组合
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 1;12(6):1443. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061443.
3
Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, and Carbohydrate Antigen 72-4 in Gastric Cancer: Is the Old Band Still Playing?

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of recurrence after radical surgery for gastric cancer: a scoring system obtained from a prospective multicenter study.胃癌根治术后复发的预测:一项前瞻性多中心研究得出的评分系统
Ann Surg. 2005 Feb;241(2):247-55. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000152019.14741.97.
2
Patterns of initial recurrence in completely resected gastric adenocarcinoma.完全切除的胃腺癌初始复发模式。
Ann Surg. 2004 Nov;240(5):808-16. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000143245.28656.15.
3
The use of tumor markers as predictors of prognosis in gastric cancer.肿瘤标志物在胃癌预后预测中的应用。
胃癌中的糖类抗原19-9、癌胚抗原和糖类抗原72-4:老歌还在奏响吗?
Gastrointest Tumors. 2018 Sep;5(1-2):1-13. doi: 10.1159/000488240. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
4
Utility of serum tumor markers as an aid in the differential diagnosis of patients with clinical suspicion of cancer and in patients with cancer of unknown primary site.血清肿瘤标志物在临床怀疑患有癌症的患者以及原发部位不明的癌症患者的鉴别诊断中的应用。
Tumour Biol. 2012 Apr;33(2):463-74. doi: 10.1007/s13277-011-0275-1. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
5
The clinical significance of ascitic fluid CEA in advanced gastric cancer with ascites.腹水 CEA 在晚期胃癌合并腹水患者中的临床意义。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr;136(4):517-26. doi: 10.1007/s00432-009-0684-3. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
6
Different roles of tumor marker monitoring after curative resections of gastric and colorectal cancers.胃癌和结直肠癌根治术后肿瘤标志物监测的不同作用。
Dig Dis Sci. 2008 Jun;53(6):1537-43. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-0046-4.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 Sep-Oct;51(59):1544-7.
4
The usefulness of CEA and/or CA19-9 in monitoring for recurrence in gastric cancer patients: a prospective clinical study.癌胚抗原(CEA)和/或糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)在监测胃癌患者复发中的应用:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Gastric Cancer. 2003;6(3):142-5. doi: 10.1007/s10120-003-0240-9.
5
DEMONSTRATION OF TUMOR-SPECIFIC ANTIGENS IN HUMAN COLONIC CARCINOMATA BY IMMUNOLOGICAL TOLERANCE AND ABSORPTION TECHNIQUES.通过免疫耐受和吸收技术证明人类结肠癌中的肿瘤特异性抗原
J Exp Med. 1965 Mar 1;121(3):439-62. doi: 10.1084/jem.121.3.439.
6
Atypical courses of serum tumor markers--4 case reports.血清肿瘤标志物的非典型病程——4例病例报告
Anticancer Res. 2003 Mar-Apr;23(2A):845-50.
7
Biologic predictors of survival in node-negative gastric cancer.淋巴结阴性胃癌生存的生物学预测指标
Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):828-35; discussion 835-7. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000072260.77776.39.
8
Comparison of serum CA72-4, CEA, TPA, CA19-9 and CA125 levels in gastric cancer patients and correlation with recurrence.胃癌患者血清CA72-4、CEA、TPA、CA19-9和CA125水平的比较及其与复发的相关性
Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Jul-Aug;49(46):1157-60.
9
Measurement of serum CA 19-9 may be more valuable than CEA in prediction of recurrence in patients with gastric cancer.对于预测胃癌患者的复发情况,血清CA 19-9检测可能比癌胚抗原(CEA)检测更具价值。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2001 Apr;24(2):148-9. doi: 10.1097/00000421-200104000-00010.
10
Clinical importance of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels in gastric cancer.术前癌胚抗原和糖类抗原19-9水平在胃癌中的临床意义
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001 Jan;32(1):41-4. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200101000-00010.