Molina Rafael, Bosch Xavier, Auge Josep M, Filella Xavier, Escudero José M, Molina Víctor, Solé Manel, López-Soto Alfonso
Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry (Unit for Cancer Research), Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, Barcelona, 08036, Spain.
Tumour Biol. 2012 Apr;33(2):463-74. doi: 10.1007/s13277-011-0275-1. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
Cancer may be diagnosed in advanced stages, when the patient has already developed metastasis, with symptoms that can be also observed in benign diseases. The objective of this study was to evaluate tumor marker sensitivity and specificity in the differential diagnosis of patients with suspected signs of cancer. We studied 2.711 consecutive patients admitted to the Internal Medicine Department of our hospital with suspected cancer; 1.240 patients had non-malignant processes and 1.471 had malignant disease. Determinations were considered positive for suspected malignancy when serum levels were carcinoembryonic antigen >15 ng/ml (>20 in patients with renal failure or liver disease), alpha fetoprotein >40 ng/ml (>80 ng/ml in patients with liver diseases), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19.9 > 200 U/ml (>500 U/ml in patients with liver diseases or gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) <150 UI/L or effusions; >1.000 U/ml in patients with jaundice or GGT > 150 UI/L), neuron-specific enolase >45 ng/ml (renal failure >50 ng/ml; samples with hemolysis were excluded), prostate-specific antigen > 30 ng/ml (excluding acute prostatitis), tumor-associated glycoprotein-72 >80 U/ml, cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1 > 7.5 ng/ml (>19 ng/ml in patients with renal failure; >11 ng/ml in patients with liver cirrhosis or jaundice), >3.5 ng/ml for squamous cell carcinoma (excluding patients with renal failure or skin disorders), CA 15.3 >100 U/ml, and CA 125 >350 U/ml (>600 U/ml in patients with pleural effusion and >900 U/ml in those with ascites). There was a specificity of 97.6% in patients without malignancy, 67.4% of sensitivity in patients with malignancy, and 75.4% of sensitivity in the 1,280 patients with epithelial tumors (53.7% in patients with locally advanced tumors and 79.4% in patients with metastases). Sensitivity was 81.4% in patients with cancer of unknown primary site. Tumor markers were useful in the differential diagnosis between epithelial and non-epithelial tumors, brain masses (metastases vs. primary tumors), and between benign or malignant origin of different clinical situations such as wasting syndrome, effusions, liver or bone lesions, and effusions with a positive predictive value higher than 95%. Tumor markers are useful as an aid in the evaluation of the risk of cancer of these patients with suspected cancer and may be useful to reduce the hospitalization time, morbidity, and the number of diagnostic tests required for diagnosis.
癌症可能在晚期才被诊断出来,此时患者已经发生了转移,其症状在良性疾病中也可能出现。本研究的目的是评估肿瘤标志物在疑似癌症体征患者的鉴别诊断中的敏感性和特异性。我们研究了我院内科收治的2711例疑似癌症的连续患者;其中1240例患者患有非恶性疾病,1471例患有恶性疾病。当血清癌胚抗原>15 ng/ml(肾衰竭或肝病患者>20 ng/ml)、甲胎蛋白>40 ng/ml(肝病患者>80 ng/ml)、糖类抗原(CA)19.9>200 U/ml(肝病或γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)<150 UI/L或有积液的患者>500 U/ml;黄疸或GGT>150 UI/L的患者>1000 U/ml)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶>45 ng/ml(肾衰竭患者>50 ng/ml;排除溶血样本)、前列腺特异性抗原>30 ng/ml(排除急性前列腺炎)、肿瘤相关糖蛋白-72>80 U/ml、细胞角蛋白19片段21-1>7.5 ng/ml(肾衰竭患者>19 ng/ml;肝硬化或黄疸患者>11 ng/ml)、鳞状细胞癌>3.5 ng/ml(排除肾衰竭或皮肤病患者)、CA 15.3>100 U/ml、CA 125>350 U/ml(胸腔积液患者>600 U/ml,腹水患者>900 U/ml)时,判定为疑似恶性肿瘤阳性。无恶性肿瘤患者的特异性为97.6%,恶性肿瘤患者的敏感性为67.4%,1280例上皮性肿瘤患者的敏感性为75.4%(局部晚期肿瘤患者为53.7%,转移患者为79.4%)。原发部位不明的癌症患者的敏感性为81.4%。肿瘤标志物在上皮性肿瘤与非上皮性肿瘤、脑肿块(转移瘤与原发性肿瘤)以及不同临床情况(如消瘦综合征、积液、肝或骨病变以及积液)的良性或恶性起源的鉴别诊断中有用,其阳性预测值高于95%。肿瘤标志物有助于评估这些疑似癌症患者的癌症风险,可能有助于缩短住院时间、降低发病率以及减少诊断所需的检查次数。