Rupp Mark E, Sholtz Lee A, Jourdan Dawn R, Marion Nedra D, Tyner Laura K, Fey Paul D, Iwen Peter C, Anderson James R
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jun 1;44(11):1408-14. doi: 10.1086/517538. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
Needleless intravascular catheter connector valves have been introduced into clinical practice to minimize the risk of needlestick injury. However, infection-control risks associated with these valves may be underappreciated. In March 2005, a dramatic increase in bloodstream infections was noted in multiple patient care units of a hospital in temporal association with the introduction of a needleless valve into use.
Surveillance for primary bloodstream infection was conducted using standard methods throughout the hospital. Blood culture contamination rates were monitored. Cultures were performed using samples obtained from intravascular catheter connector valves.
The relative risk of bloodstream infection for the time period in which the suspect connector valve was in use, compared with baseline, was 2.79 (95% confidence interval, 2.27-3.43). In critical care units, the rate of primary bloodstream infection increased with the introduction of the valve from 3.87 infections per 1000 catheter-days to 10.64 infections per 1000 catheter-days (P<.001), and it decreased to 5.59 infections per 1000 catheter-days (P=.02) in the 6 months following removal of the device from use. Similarly, in inpatient nursing units, the rate of bloodstream infection increased from 3.47 infections per 1000 catheter-days to 7.3 infections per 1000 catheter-days (P=.02) following introduction of the device, and it decreased to 2.88 infections per 1000 catheter-days (P=.57) following removal of the device from use. Similar events occurred in the cooperative care units. The rate of blood culture contamination did not substantially change over the course of the study. Of 37 valves that were subjected to microbiological sample testing, 24.3% yielded microbes, predominantly coagulase-negative staphylococci.
A significant association between primary bloodstream infection and a needleless connector valve was observed. Evaluation of needleless connector valves should include a thorough assessment of infection risks in prospective randomized trials prior to their introduction to the market.
无针血管导管连接阀已应用于临床实践,以尽量减少针刺伤风险。然而,与这些阀门相关的感染控制风险可能未得到充分认识。2005年3月,一家医院的多个患者护理单元中血流感染显著增加,这与一种无针阀的投入使用在时间上相关。
在全院使用标准方法对原发性血流感染进行监测。监测血培养污染率。使用从血管导管连接阀获取的样本进行培养。
与基线相比,使用可疑连接阀期间血流感染的相对风险为2.79(95%置信区间,2.27 - 3.43)。在重症监护病房,随着该阀门的引入,原发性血流感染率从每1000导管日3.87例感染增加到每1000导管日10.64例感染(P <.001),在该装置停用后的6个月内降至每1000导管日5.59例感染(P =.02)。同样,在住院护理单元,引入该装置后血流感染率从每1000导管日3.47例感染增加到每1000导管日7.3例感染(P =.02),该装置停用后降至每1000导管日2.88例感染(P =.57)。合作护理单元也发生了类似事件。在研究过程中,血培养污染率没有实质性变化。在接受微生物样本检测的37个阀门中,24.3%培养出微生物,主要是凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌。
观察到原发性血流感染与无针连接阀之间存在显著关联。在无针连接阀投放市场之前,对其评估应包括在前瞻性随机试验中对感染风险进行全面评估。