Suppr超能文献

高速机动车事故后影响损伤模式和损伤严重程度的因素——一项回顾性研究

Factors influencing the injury pattern and injury severity after high speed motor vehicle accident--a retrospective study.

作者信息

Weninger Patrick, Hertz Harald

机构信息

Trauma Hospital Lorenz Boehler, Donaueschingenstrasse 13, A-1200 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2007 Oct;75(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.03.011. Epub 2007 May 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Motor vehicular accidents (MVA) are the leading cause of death among people under 40 years of age. Despite improvement in car safety and driver awareness of the use of safety devices, fatalities and severe injuries continue to occur.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 1997 to 2004, 13,678 patients after MVA were admitted to our institution. Out of this cohort, 584 (4.3%) patients suffered blunt major trauma defined as Injury Severity Score (ISS) >or=16 and at least one life-threatening injury in one body region. Preclinical data were recorded in 458 patients matching the inclusion criteria. The circumstances of the trauma scene such as weather conditions were analysed as well as technical crash data such as direction of impact, security devices used and type and severity of automobile damage. In a retrospective trial, the influence of preclinical variables on the injury pattern and on injury severity was investigated.

RESULTS

314 (68.6%) patients were male and 144 (31.4%) female. Injury severity (p=0.015) and rate of multiple injuries (p=0.012) were higher in patients after side-impact crashes. If automobiles with SIPS were used, injury severity was significantly reduced in case of side-impact crashes (p=0.003). Patients after frontal impact crashes had a higher rate of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) compared to the overall cohort (p=0.014). Patients suffering blunt aortic (n=29) dissection were involved in frontal crashes with seat belt use (p<0.001). If patients were entrapped, injury severity (p=0.021) and rate of multiple injuries (p=0.018) were significantly higher. Rear-end collisions with trucks without rear protection led to higher mortality rates (p=0.011).

CONCLUSION

According to our data significant association between technical crash data and injury pattern and injury severity can be assumed. In case of high speed MVA in rural areas the trauma mechanism and the circumstances (i.e., impact direction, automobile deformation) should be considered to identify patients at high risk of severe blunt trauma and multiple injuries.

摘要

引言

机动车事故(MVA)是40岁以下人群的主要死亡原因。尽管汽车安全性有所提高,且驾驶员对安全装置的使用意识增强,但死亡和重伤仍时有发生。

材料与方法

1997年至2004年,13678例机动车事故患者被收治于我院。在该队列中,584例(4.3%)患者遭受钝性严重创伤,定义为损伤严重度评分(ISS)≥16分,且身体某一区域至少有一处危及生命的损伤。458例符合纳入标准的患者记录了临床前数据。分析了创伤现场的情况,如天气状况,以及技术碰撞数据,如撞击方向、使用的安全装置和汽车损坏的类型及严重程度。在一项回顾性试验中,研究了临床前变量对损伤模式和损伤严重程度的影响。

结果

314例(68.6%)患者为男性,144例(31.4%)为女性。侧面碰撞事故患者的损伤严重程度(p = 0.015)和多发伤发生率(p = 0.012)更高。如果使用配备侧面碰撞保护系统(SIPS)的汽车,侧面碰撞事故时损伤严重程度会显著降低(p = 0.003)。与整个队列相比,正面碰撞事故患者的严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)发生率更高(p = 0.014)。29例钝性主动脉夹层患者发生正面碰撞事故时系了安全带(p < 0.001)。如果患者被困,损伤严重程度(p = 0.021)和多发伤发生率(p = 0.018)会显著更高。与没有后部防护的卡车发生追尾碰撞会导致更高的死亡率(p = 0.011)。

结论

根据我们的数据,可以认为技术碰撞数据与损伤模式和损伤严重程度之间存在显著关联。在农村地区发生高速机动车事故的情况下,应考虑创伤机制和情况(即撞击方向、汽车变形),以识别严重钝性创伤和多发伤的高危患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验