• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对移民的认知:改变社会支配取向较高者的态度

Perceptions of immigrants: modifying the attitudes of individuals higher in social dominance orientation.

作者信息

Danso Henry A, Sedlovskaya Alexandra, Suanda Sumarga H

机构信息

Wesleyan University, Department of Psychology, Middletown, CT 06459, USA.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Aug;33(8):1113-23. doi: 10.1177/0146167207301015. Epub 2007 May 4.

DOI:10.1177/0146167207301015
PMID:17483398
Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that directly challenging people's beliefs about immigrants may result in even stronger anti-immigration attitudes, especially among those higher in social dominance orientation (SDO). In addition, inducing the perception that immigrants are part of a larger ingroup does not modify immigration attitudes. In three studies, the article explores conditions that can reduce prejudice toward immigrants among those high in SDO. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate that focusing attention on group identity maintains prejudice, whereas focusing attention on others reduces prejudice among those higher in SDO. Study 3 extends the findings of the first two studies by demonstrating that focusing attention on others in a way that induces perception of similarity with immigrants maintains negative attitudes toward immigrants, whereas focusing on individual values reduces prejudice among those higher in SDO. Implications for how prejudice could be reduced among those high in SDO through de-emphasis on group identity are discussed.

摘要

先前的研究表明,直接挑战人们对移民的看法可能会导致更强烈的反移民态度,尤其是在那些社会支配取向(SDO)较高的人群中。此外,让人们认为移民是一个更大的内群体的一部分,并不能改变他们对移民的态度。在三项研究中,本文探讨了能够减少SDO较高者对移民偏见的条件。研究1和研究2表明,将注意力集中在群体身份上会维持偏见,而将注意力集中在他人身上则会减少SDO较高者的偏见。研究3扩展了前两项研究的结果,表明以一种引发与移民相似感的方式将注意力集中在他人身上会维持对移民的负面态度,而关注个人价值观则会减少SDO较高者的偏见。本文还讨论了如何通过淡化群体身份来减少SDO较高者的偏见。

相似文献

1
Perceptions of immigrants: modifying the attitudes of individuals higher in social dominance orientation.对移民的认知:改变社会支配取向较高者的态度
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Aug;33(8):1113-23. doi: 10.1177/0146167207301015. Epub 2007 May 4.
2
A joke is just a joke (except when it isn't): cavalier humor beliefs facilitate the expression of group dominance motives.笑话就是笑话(除非不是):轻率的幽默信念促进了群体支配动机的表达。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Oct;99(4):660-82. doi: 10.1037/a0019627.
3
Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups.右翼威权主义和社会支配取向对外群体态度的差异影响及其通过来自外群体的威胁和与外群体的竞争所起的中介作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):684-96. doi: 10.1177/0146167205284282.
4
Ingroup identification and group-level narcissism as predictors of U.S. citizens' attitudes and behavior toward Arab immigrants.群体认同和群体自恋度预测美国公民对阿拉伯移民的态度和行为。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Sep;36(9):1267-80. doi: 10.1177/0146167210380604. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
5
The social costs of extrinsic relative to intrinsic goal pursuits: their relation with social dominance and racial and ethnic prejudice.外在目标追求相对于内在目标追求的社会成本:它们与社会支配以及种族和民族偏见的关系。
J Pers. 2007 Aug;75(4):757-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00456.x.
6
Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes.人际厌恶、意识形态取向和去人性化作为群体间态度的预测因素。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Aug;18(8):691-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01962.x.
7
The role of ingroup threat and conservative ideologies on prejudice against immigrants in two samples of Italian adults.内群体威胁和保守意识形态在两组意大利成年人样本中对移民偏见的作用。
J Soc Psychol. 2017;157(1):86-97. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2016.1176552. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
8
Developmental changes in sexual prejudice from early to late adolescence: the effects of gender, race, and ideology on different patterns of change.青少年早期到晚期性偏见的发展变化:性别、种族和意识形态对不同变化模式的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2012 Sep;48(5):1403-15. doi: 10.1037/a0026906. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
9
Attitudes toward group-based inequality: social dominance or social identity?对基于群体的不平等的态度:社会支配还是社会认同?
Br J Soc Psychol. 2003 Jun;42(Pt 2):161-86. doi: 10.1348/014466603322127166.
10
Essentialist beliefs about homosexuality: structure and implications for prejudice.关于同性恋的本质主义信念:结构及其对偏见的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Apr;32(4):471-85. doi: 10.1177/0146167205276516.

引用本文的文献

1
Identity salience moderates the effect of social dominance orientation on COVID-19 'rule bending'.身份凸显调节社会支配倾向对 COVID-19“规则破坏”的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Mar;223:103460. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103460. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
2
Toleration and prejudice-reduction: Two ways of improving intergroup relations.宽容与减少偏见:改善群体间关系的两种方式。
Eur J Soc Psychol. 2020 Mar;50(2):239-255. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2624. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
3
Critical consciousness moderates the relationship between transphobia and "bathroom bill" voting.
批判性意识调节跨性别恐惧症与“浴室法案”投票之间的关系。
J Couns Psychol. 2018 Jul;65(4):403-412. doi: 10.1037/cou0000270.