Verkuyten Maykel, Yogeeswaran Kumar, Adelman Levi
Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences Ercomer Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.
University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand.
Eur J Soc Psychol. 2020 Mar;50(2):239-255. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2624. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
While a large body of social psychological research has shed light on the nature of prejudice and how to reduce it, we argue that such work does not address situations of cultural or religious outgroup beliefs and practices that are considered incompatible with one's own. The present theoretical article contrasts a prejudice-reduction approach with a toleration-based approach to consider the differences each have with regard to the attitude object they focus upon, the perceived reasonableness of the attitude, and the behavioral consequences each may lead to. In doing so, we consider the psychological processes involved in whether the negative attitude leads to negative actions. We conclude by arguing that a toleration-based approach forms an important addition to the psychological thinking about cultural diversity and intergroup relations. Collectively, the present work makes a novel contribution to the social psychological literature by stimulating theory development and raising novel questions for empirical research.
虽然大量社会心理学研究已经阐明了偏见的本质以及如何减少偏见,但我们认为,此类研究并未涉及被认为与自身不相容的文化或宗教外群体信仰及习俗的情况。本文从理论角度将减少偏见的方法与基于宽容的方法进行对比,以考量它们在各自关注的态度对象、态度的感知合理性以及可能导致的行为后果等方面存在的差异。在此过程中,我们思考了消极态度导致消极行为所涉及的心理过程。我们的结论是,基于宽容的方法是对文化多样性和群体间关系心理思考的重要补充。总体而言,本研究通过推动理论发展和提出新的实证研究问题,为社会心理学文献做出了新颖的贡献。