• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

右翼威权主义和社会支配取向对外群体态度的差异影响及其通过来自外群体的威胁和与外群体的竞争所起的中介作用。

Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups.

作者信息

Duckitt John

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):684-96. doi: 10.1177/0146167205284282.

DOI:10.1177/0146167205284282
PMID:16702160
Abstract

A dual-process model of individual differences in prejudice proneness proposes that Right Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) and Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) will influence prejudice against particular outgroups through different motivational mechanisms. RWA should cause negative attitudes toward groups seen as threatening social control, order, cohesion, and stability, such as deviant groups, and negativity toward these groups should be mediated through perceived threat from them. SDO should cause negative attitudes toward groups that activate competitiveness over relative dominance and superiority, such as socially subordinate groups low in power and status, and negativity toward these groups should be mediated through competitiveness toward them. Findings from four student samples that assessed attitudes toward seven social groups selected as likely to vary systematically in social threat and social subordination supported these predictions. The findings have implications for reconciling intergroup and individual difference explanations of prejudice and for interventions to reduce prejudice.

摘要

一种关于偏见倾向个体差异的双过程模型提出,右翼威权主义(RWA)和社会支配取向(SDO)将通过不同的动机机制影响对特定外群体的偏见。RWA应该导致对被视为威胁社会控制、秩序、凝聚力和稳定性的群体,如越轨群体,产生消极态度,而对这些群体的消极态度应该通过对它们的感知威胁来介导。SDO应该导致对引发相对支配和优越感竞争的群体,如权力和地位较低的社会从属群体,产生消极态度,而对这些群体的消极态度应该通过对它们的竞争来介导。来自四个学生样本的研究结果评估了对七个被选为在社会威胁和社会从属方面可能有系统差异的社会群体的态度,支持了这些预测。这些发现对于调和群体间和个体差异对偏见的解释以及减少偏见的干预措施具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups.右翼威权主义和社会支配取向对外群体态度的差异影响及其通过来自外群体的威胁和与外群体的竞争所起的中介作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):684-96. doi: 10.1177/0146167205284282.
2
The personality bases of ideology: a one-year longitudinal study.意识形态的人格基础:一项为期一年的纵向研究。
J Soc Psychol. 2010 Sep-Oct;150(5):540-59. doi: 10.1080/00224540903365364.
3
Differential effects of intergroup contact for authoritarians and social dominators: a dual process model perspective.群体间接触对权威主义者和社会支配论者的差异化影响:双过程模型视角。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Apr;38(4):477-90. doi: 10.1177/0146167211429747. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
4
Big-five personality, social worldviews, and ideological attitudes: further tests of a dual process cognitive-motivational model.大五人格、社会世界观和意识形态态度:双过程认知动机模型的进一步检验。
J Soc Psychol. 2009 Oct;149(5):545-61. doi: 10.1080/00224540903232308.
5
Antecedents of men's hostile and benevolent sexism: the dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism.男性敌对性和善意性性别歧视的前因:社会支配取向和右翼权威主义的双重作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Feb;33(2):160-72. doi: 10.1177/0146167206294745.
6
The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001.右翼威权主义和社会支配取向的动机基础:与2001年9月11日事件后价值观和态度的关系
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Oct;31(10):1425-34. doi: 10.1177/0146167205275614.
7
Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: a dual-process motivational model.人格、意识形态、偏见和政治:一种双重加工动机模型。
J Pers. 2010 Dec;78(6):1861-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
8
A joke is just a joke (except when it isn't): cavalier humor beliefs facilitate the expression of group dominance motives.笑话就是笑话(除非不是):轻率的幽默信念促进了群体支配动机的表达。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Oct;99(4):660-82. doi: 10.1037/a0019627.
9
The dimensional structure of people's fears, threats, and concerns and their relationship with right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation.人们的恐惧、威胁和担忧的维度结构及其与右翼威权主义和社会支配倾向的关系。
Int J Psychol. 2013;48(1):6-17. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.696651.
10
The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: testing a dual process model.意识形态与偏见的心理基础:对双加工模型的检验
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jul;83(1):75-93.

引用本文的文献

1
Who values competent minds and who likes warm hearts? The role of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation in shaping voter preferences for political candidates.谁看重有能力的头脑,谁喜欢温暖的心?右翼威权主义和社会支配取向在塑造选民对政治候选人的偏好中的作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jul;64(3):e70004. doi: 10.1111/bjso.70004.
2
Exploring the general acceptance factor for shared automated vehicles: the impact of personality traits and experimentally altered information.探索共享自动驾驶车辆的普遍接受因素:人格特质和实验性改变信息的影响。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 9;16:1531386. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1531386. eCollection 2025.
3
Our ways will not change: Future collective continuity increases present prosocial considerations.
我们的方式不会改变:未来的集体延续性会增加当下的亲社会考量。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jan;64(1):e12847. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12847.
4
Registered report protocol: Stress testing predictive models of ideological prejudice.注册报告方案:检验意识形态偏见预测模型的压力测试。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 29;19(8):e0308397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308397. eCollection 2024.
5
Predicting hostility towards women: incel-related factors in a general sample of men.预测对女性的敌意:男性普通样本中与“非自愿独身者”相关的因素
Scand J Psychol. 2025 Feb;66(1):35-46. doi: 10.1111/sjop.13062. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
6
The N400 effect captures nuances in implicit political preferences.N400 效应捕捉到了隐性政治偏好的细微差别。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 20;14(1):16730. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67763-7.
7
Classical and Modern Prejudice toward Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: The Role of Experienced Contact, Beliefs in a Just World and Social Dominance Orientation.经典与现代对智力障碍个体的偏见:体验性接触、公正世界信念和社会支配倾向的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Mar 16;21(3):355. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030355.
8
The Wrath of Candidates. Drivers of Fear and Enthusiasm Appeals in Election Campaigns across the Globe.候选人的愤怒。全球竞选活动中恐惧与热情诉求的驱动因素。
J Polit Mark. 2021 Jun 4;23(1):74-91. doi: 10.1080/15377857.2021.1930327. eCollection 2024.
9
When out-groups are perceived as out of place: urban disorder sensitivity and environmental distance.当外群体被视为格格不入时:城市无序敏感度与环境距离
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2021 Dec 10;10(2):123-134. doi: 10.5114/cipp.2021.110842. eCollection 2022.
10
Validation of the subtle and blatant prejudice towards Bolivian immigrants scale in Argentina.阿根廷针对玻利维亚移民的微妙与公然偏见量表的验证
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2023 Jun 2;36(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s41155-023-00257-z.