Cokely Edward T, Kelley Colleen M, Gilchrist Amanda L
Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4301, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Dec;13(6):991-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03213914.
Some research on attentional control in working memory has emphasized theoretical capacity differences. However, strategic behavior, which has been relatively unexplored, can also influence attentional control and its relationship to cognitive performance. In two experiments, we examined the relationship between attentional control (measured with operation span) and interference in a part-list cuing paradigm. Paradoxically, the results indicated that superior attentional control was related to increased interference. This relationship reflected the participants' use of more complex encoding strategies, rather than superior interference control at retrieval, and was eliminated following brief encoding strategy training. The results suggest that complex span measures sometimes predict individual differences in task strategies related to interference control and that these strategies may be amenable to training. The implications for working memory research and the roles of strategies in basic memory and attention paradigms are briefly discussed.
一些关于工作记忆中注意力控制的研究强调了理论容量差异。然而,相对未被充分探索的策略行为也会影响注意力控制及其与认知表现的关系。在两项实验中,我们研究了注意力控制(通过操作广度来衡量)与部分列表线索范式中的干扰之间的关系。矛盾的是,结果表明更好的注意力控制与干扰增加有关。这种关系反映了参与者使用了更复杂的编码策略,而不是在检索时更好的干扰控制,并且在经过简短的编码策略训练后这种关系消失了。结果表明,复杂广度测量有时可以预测与干扰控制相关的任务策略中的个体差异,并且这些策略可能适合训练。我们简要讨论了这些结果对工作记忆研究的启示以及策略在基本记忆和注意力范式中的作用。