• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉手术中用于预测分流管使用的残端压力和体感诱发电位。

Stump pressure and somatosensory evoked potentials for predicting the use of shunt during carotid surgery.

作者信息

Astarci P, Guerit J M, Robert A, Elkhoury G, Noirhomme P, Rubay J, Lacroix V, Poncelet A, Funker J C, Glineur D, Verhelst R

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, St. Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2007 May;21(3):312-7. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2006.07.009.

DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2006.07.009
PMID:17484967
Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare measurement of stump pressure (SP) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) made during carotid surgery as criteria upon which to base the decision whether or not to use a shunt. We included 288 patients who underwent for carotid surgery under general anaesthesia. We performed 247 endarterectomies with patch closure (85.7%), 25 carotid transsection with reimplantation (8.7%), and 16 carotid bypasses (5.6%). SSEP monitoring showed no modification in 225/288 patients (78.1%), moderate modification in 32/288 patients (11.1%), and severe modification in 31/288 patients (10.8%). Shunt was used if there was moderate or severe SSEP modification in response to carotid clamping, which represents 63 patients in our series. A shunt was used in 47/288 patients (16.3%). In 16 patients, despite SSEP modifications, the shunt was not used because these SSEP modifications occurred only in the last minutes of the procedure just before off clamping the carotid. The mean SP for all patients was 51 mm Hg. In the shunted patients, the mean SP was 33 mm Hg. Variation of SP was correlated with the SSEP modifications. There was just one perioperative stroke in this series (1/288 = 0.3%). We concluded that the threshold of SP below which shunting is indicated in our study was 44 mm Hg with 81% sensibility and 68% specificity.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较在颈动脉手术过程中进行的残端压力(SP)测量和体感诱发电位(SSEP),以此作为决定是否使用分流管的标准。我们纳入了288例在全身麻醉下接受颈动脉手术的患者。我们进行了247例带补片修补的内膜切除术(85.7%)、25例颈动脉横断再植术(8.7%)和16例颈动脉搭桥术(5.6%)。SSEP监测显示,225/288例患者(78.1%)无变化,32/288例患者(11.1%)有中度变化,31/288例患者(10.8%)有重度变化。如果在夹闭颈动脉时SSEP有中度或重度变化,则使用分流管,在我们的系列研究中有63例患者属于这种情况。288例患者中有47例(16.3%)使用了分流管。在16例患者中,尽管SSEP有变化,但未使用分流管,因为这些SSEP变化仅发生在手术最后几分钟即将松开颈动脉夹闭之前。所有患者的平均SP为51 mmHg。使用分流管的患者,平均SP为33 mmHg。SP的变化与SSEP的变化相关。本系列研究中仅有1例围手术期卒中(1/288 = 0.3%)。我们得出结论,在我们的研究中,提示需要使用分流管的SP阈值为44 mmHg,敏感性为81%,特异性为68%。

相似文献

1
Stump pressure and somatosensory evoked potentials for predicting the use of shunt during carotid surgery.颈动脉手术中用于预测分流管使用的残端压力和体感诱发电位。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2007 May;21(3):312-7. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2006.07.009.
2
[Benefits and effectiveness of recording somatosensory evoked potentials in surgery on the carotid artery].[颈动脉手术中记录体感诱发电位的益处及有效性]
Zentralbl Chir. 2004 Jun;129(3):172-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-822784.
3
Correlation of carotid artery stump pressure and neurologic changes during 474 carotid endarterectomies performed in awake patients.474例清醒患者行颈动脉内膜剥脱术期间颈动脉残端压力与神经功能变化的相关性
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Oct;42(4):684-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.06.003.
4
Cerebral oximetry does not correlate with electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potentials in determining the need for shunting during carotid endarterectomy.在颈动脉内膜切除术期间,脑血氧饱和度在确定是否需要分流方面与脑电图和体感诱发电位不相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Sep;48(3):601-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.04.065. Epub 2008 Jul 18.
5
Prospective evaluation of electroencephalography, carotid artery stump pressure, and neurologic changes during 314 consecutive carotid endarterectomies performed in awake patients.对314例清醒患者连续进行颈动脉内膜切除术期间的脑电图、颈动脉残端压力和神经学变化进行前瞻性评估。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Mar;45(3):511-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.11.035. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
6
Stratification of intraoperative ischemic impact by somatosensory evoked potential monitoring, diffusion-weighted imaging and magnetic resonance angiography in carotid endarterectomy with routine shunt use.在常规使用分流器的颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)中,通过体感诱发电位监测、弥散加权成像和磁共振血管造影对术中缺血影响进行分层。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013 Nov;155(11):2085-96. doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1858-y. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
7
Intraoperative assessment of cerebral ischaemia during carotid surgery.颈动脉手术期间脑缺血的术中评估。
Int Angiol. 1998 Mar;17(1):10-4.
8
Intraoperative use of somatosensory evoked potentials for brain monitoring during carotid surgery.术中使用体感诱发电位在颈动脉手术期间进行脑监测。
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1996 Oct;7(4):693-702.
9
[Somatosensory evoked potentials and biochemical markers of neuronal deficits in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia].[区域麻醉下行颈动脉内膜切除术患者的体感诱发电位与神经元损伤的生化标志物]
Zentralbl Chir. 2007 Jun;132(3):176-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-960727.
10
Significant correlation between cerebral oximetry and carotid stump pressure during carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术中脑血氧饱和度与颈动脉残端压力之间存在显著相关性。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;22(1):58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.07.022. Epub 2007 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Routine versus selective near-infrared spectroscopy-guided shunting during carotid eversion endarterectomy.颈动脉外翻内膜切除术中常规与选择性近红外光谱引导分流的比较。
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Feb 6;36(2). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad005.
2
Correlation between Carotid Stenosis Degree and Blood Pressure Variability in Patients with Carotid Stenosis.颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉狭窄程度与血压变异性的相关性。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 May 21;2022:4305015. doi: 10.1155/2022/4305015. eCollection 2022.
3
The Role of Carotid Stump Pressure in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
颈动脉残端压力在颈动脉内膜切除术中的作用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Vasc Dis. 2020 Mar 25;13(1):28-37. doi: 10.3400/avd.ra.19-00100.
4
The Efficacy of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Monitoring in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Prospective, Single-Center, Observational Study.近红外光谱监测在颈动脉内膜切除术的疗效:一项前瞻性、单中心、观察性研究。
Cell Transplant. 2019 Feb;28(2):170-175. doi: 10.1177/0963689718817760. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
5
Impact of general versus local anesthesia on early postoperative cognitive dysfunction following carotid endarterectomy: GALA Study Subgroup Analysis.全身麻醉与局部麻醉对颈动脉内膜切除术后早期认知功能障碍的影响:GALA研究亚组分析
World J Surg. 2009 Jul;33(7):1526-32. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0047-x.