Suppr超能文献

颈动脉手术中用于预测分流管使用的残端压力和体感诱发电位。

Stump pressure and somatosensory evoked potentials for predicting the use of shunt during carotid surgery.

作者信息

Astarci P, Guerit J M, Robert A, Elkhoury G, Noirhomme P, Rubay J, Lacroix V, Poncelet A, Funker J C, Glineur D, Verhelst R

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, St. Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2007 May;21(3):312-7. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2006.07.009.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare measurement of stump pressure (SP) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) made during carotid surgery as criteria upon which to base the decision whether or not to use a shunt. We included 288 patients who underwent for carotid surgery under general anaesthesia. We performed 247 endarterectomies with patch closure (85.7%), 25 carotid transsection with reimplantation (8.7%), and 16 carotid bypasses (5.6%). SSEP monitoring showed no modification in 225/288 patients (78.1%), moderate modification in 32/288 patients (11.1%), and severe modification in 31/288 patients (10.8%). Shunt was used if there was moderate or severe SSEP modification in response to carotid clamping, which represents 63 patients in our series. A shunt was used in 47/288 patients (16.3%). In 16 patients, despite SSEP modifications, the shunt was not used because these SSEP modifications occurred only in the last minutes of the procedure just before off clamping the carotid. The mean SP for all patients was 51 mm Hg. In the shunted patients, the mean SP was 33 mm Hg. Variation of SP was correlated with the SSEP modifications. There was just one perioperative stroke in this series (1/288 = 0.3%). We concluded that the threshold of SP below which shunting is indicated in our study was 44 mm Hg with 81% sensibility and 68% specificity.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较在颈动脉手术过程中进行的残端压力(SP)测量和体感诱发电位(SSEP),以此作为决定是否使用分流管的标准。我们纳入了288例在全身麻醉下接受颈动脉手术的患者。我们进行了247例带补片修补的内膜切除术(85.7%)、25例颈动脉横断再植术(8.7%)和16例颈动脉搭桥术(5.6%)。SSEP监测显示,225/288例患者(78.1%)无变化,32/288例患者(11.1%)有中度变化,31/288例患者(10.8%)有重度变化。如果在夹闭颈动脉时SSEP有中度或重度变化,则使用分流管,在我们的系列研究中有63例患者属于这种情况。288例患者中有47例(16.3%)使用了分流管。在16例患者中,尽管SSEP有变化,但未使用分流管,因为这些SSEP变化仅发生在手术最后几分钟即将松开颈动脉夹闭之前。所有患者的平均SP为51 mmHg。使用分流管的患者,平均SP为33 mmHg。SP的变化与SSEP的变化相关。本系列研究中仅有1例围手术期卒中(1/288 = 0.3%)。我们得出结论,在我们的研究中,提示需要使用分流管的SP阈值为44 mmHg,敏感性为81%,特异性为68%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验