Suppr超能文献

基于办公室的动机性访谈预防儿童肥胖:一项可行性研究。

Office-based motivational interviewing to prevent childhood obesity: a feasibility study.

作者信息

Schwartz Robert P, Hamre Robin, Dietz William H, Wasserman Richard C, Slora Eric J, Myers Esther F, Sullivan Susan, Rockett Helaine, Thoma Kathleen A, Dumitru Gema, Resnicow Kenneth A

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, and Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 May;161(5):495-501. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.5.495.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether pediatricians and dietitians can implement an office-based obesity prevention program using motivational interviewing as the primary intervention.

DESIGN

Nonrandomized clinical trial. Fifteen pediatricians belonging to Pediatric Research in Office Settings, a national practice-based research network, and 5 registered dietitians were assigned to 1 of 3 groups: (1) control; (2) minimal intervention (pediatrician only); or (3) intensive intervention (pediatrician and registered dietitian).

SETTING

Primary care pediatric offices.

PARTICIPANTS

Ninety-one children presenting for well-child care visits met eligibility criteria of being aged 3 to 7 years and having a body mass index (calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared) at the 85th percentile or greater but lower than the 95th percentile for the age or having a normal weight and a parent with a body mass index of 30 or greater.

INTERVENTIONS

Pediatricians and registered dietitians in the intervention groups received motivational interviewing training. Parents of children in the minimal intervention group received 1 motivational interviewing session from the physician, and parents of children in the intensive intervention group received 2 motivational interviewing sessions each from the pediatrician and the registered dietitian.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Change in the body mass index-for-age percentile.

RESULTS

At 6 months' follow-up, there was a decrease of 0.6, 1.9, and 2.6 body mass index percentiles in the control, minimal, and intensive groups, respectively. The differences in body mass index percentile change between the 3 groups were nonsignificant (P=.85). The patient dropout rates were 2 (10%), 13 (32%), and 15 (50%) for the control, minimal, and intensive groups, respectively. Fifteen (94%) of the parents reported that the intervention helped them think about changing their family's eating habits.

CONCLUSIONS

Motivational interviewing by pediatricians and dietitians is a promising office-based strategy for preventing childhood obesity. However, additional studies are needed to demonstrate the efficacy of this intervention in practice settings.

摘要

目的

确定儿科医生和营养师能否实施以动机性访谈作为主要干预措施的门诊肥胖预防项目。

设计

非随机临床试验。15名隶属于全国基于实践的研究网络“门诊儿科研究”的儿科医生和5名注册营养师被分配到3组中的1组:(1)对照组;(2)最小干预组(仅儿科医生);或(3)强化干预组(儿科医生和注册营养师)。

地点

基层医疗儿科门诊。

参与者

91名前来进行健康儿童检查的儿童符合入选标准,年龄在3至7岁之间,体重指数(计算方法为体重千克数除以身高米数的平方)处于该年龄组第85百分位数或更高但低于第95百分位数,或者体重正常但父母体重指数为30或更高。

干预措施

干预组的儿科医生和注册营养师接受动机性访谈培训。最小干预组儿童的父母接受医生进行的1次动机性访谈,强化干预组儿童的父母分别接受儿科医生和注册营养师进行的各2次动机性访谈。

主要观察指标

年龄别体重指数百分位数的变化。

结果

在6个月的随访中,对照组、最小干预组和强化干预组的体重指数百分位数分别下降了0.6、1.9和2.6。三组体重指数百分位数变化的差异无统计学意义(P = 0.85)。对照组、最小干预组和强化干预组的患者退出率分别为2例(10%)、13例(32%)和15例(50%)。15名(94%)家长报告称干预帮助他们思考改变家庭饮食习惯。

结论

儿科医生和营养师进行的动机性访谈是一种有前景的门诊预防儿童肥胖策略。然而,需要更多研究来证明该干预措施在实际环境中的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验