• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Habitat specialization, body size, and family identity explain lepidopteran density-area relationships in a cross-continental comparison.在一项跨大陆比较中,栖息地专业化、体型和科属特征解释了鳞翅目昆虫的密度-面积关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 15;104(20):8368-73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611462104. Epub 2007 May 7.
2
Relative contributions of local and regional factors to species richness and total density of butterflies and moths in semi-natural grasslands.半自然草原中局部和区域因素对蝴蝶和蛾类物种丰富度及总密度的相对贡献。
Oecologia. 2009 Jun;160(3):577-87. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1328-7. Epub 2009 Mar 29.
3
Life-history traits predict species responses to habitat area and isolation: a cross-continental synthesis.生活史特征预测物种对生境面积和隔离的响应:一项跨大陆的综合研究。
Ecol Lett. 2010 Aug 1;13(8):969-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01487.x. Epub 2010 May 12.
4
Higher mobility of butterflies than moths connected to habitat suitability and body size in a release experiment.在一项放飞实验中,蝴蝶比飞蛾具有更高的移动性,这与栖息地适宜性和体型有关。
Ecol Evol. 2014 Oct;4(19):3800-11. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1187. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
5
Species diversity and persistence in restored and remnant tallgrass prairies of North America: a function of species' life history, habitat type, or sampling bias?北美恢复和残留高草草原的物种多样性与持久性:物种生活史、栖息地类型还是抽样偏差的作用?
J Anim Ecol. 2008 May;77(3):487-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01356.x. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
6
Species-area relationships are controlled by species traits.种-面积关系受物种特征控制。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037359. Epub 2012 May 21.
7
Phylogenomics reveals the evolutionary timing and pattern of butterflies and moths.系统发生基因组学揭示了蝴蝶和蛾类的进化时间和模式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 5;116(45):22657-22663. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907847116. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
8
Breakpoints in butterfly decline in Central Europe over the last century.上个世纪中欧蝴蝶数量减少的转折点。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Dec 10;851(Pt 2):158315. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158315. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
9
Climate change effects on animal ecology: butterflies and moths as a case study.气候变化对动物生态学的影响:以蝴蝶和蛾类为例。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021 Oct;96(5):2113-2126. doi: 10.1111/brv.12746. Epub 2021 May 30.
10
Color, iridescence, and thermoregulation in Lepidoptera.鳞翅目昆虫的颜色、虹彩及体温调节
Appl Opt. 2008 Oct 10;47(29):5235-41. doi: 10.1364/ao.47.005235.

引用本文的文献

1
The Ultramorphology and Sexual Dimorphism of Antennae and Sensilla in the Pale Grass Blue, (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae).淡青斑蝶触角及感器的超微形态与两性异形(鳞翅目:灰蝶科)
Insects. 2024 Sep 14;15(9):698. doi: 10.3390/insects15090698.
2
Increasing crop field size does not consistently exacerbate insect pest problems.增加作物田块的面积并不一定会加剧虫害问题。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Sep 13;119(37):e2208813119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2208813119. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
Cross-species pathogen spillover across ecosystem boundaries: mechanisms and theory.跨物种病原体溢出跨越生态系统边界:机制和理论。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Sep 30;374(1782):20180344. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0344. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
4
Size-dependent movement explains why bigger is better in fragmented landscapes.体型依赖的移动性解释了为何在破碎化景观中体型越大越好。
Ecol Evol. 2018 Oct 23;8(22):10754-10767. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4524. eCollection 2018 Nov.
5
The minimum area requirements (MAR) for giant panda: an empirical study.大熊猫最小生存面积需求:一项实证研究。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 8;6:37715. doi: 10.1038/srep37715.
6
Safeguarding Ecosystem Services: A Methodological Framework to Buffer the Joint Effect of Habitat Configuration and Climate Change.保护生态系统服务:一个缓冲栖息地配置和气候变化联合影响的方法框架。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 19;10(6):e0129225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129225. eCollection 2015.
7
Brain composition in Godyris zavaleta, a diurnal butterfly, Reflects an increased reliance on olfactory information.日间活动的蝴蝶戈迪里斯·扎瓦莱塔的大脑组成反映出其对嗅觉信息的依赖增加。
J Comp Neurol. 2015 Apr 15;523(6):869-91. doi: 10.1002/cne.23711. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
8
Population densities and density-area relationships in a community with advective dispersal and variable mosaics of resource patches.具有平流扩散和资源斑块可变镶嵌的群落中的种群密度及密度-面积关系
Oecologia. 2014 Dec;176(4):985-96. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3062-z. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
9
Insect density-plant density relationships: a modified view of insect responses to resource concentrations.昆虫密度-植物密度关系:对昆虫对资源浓度响应的一种修正观点。
Oecologia. 2013 Dec;173(4):1333-44. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2737-1. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
10
Mechanisms driving the density-area relationship in a saproxylic beetle.驱动木质甲虫密度-面积关系的机制。
Oecologia. 2013 Dec;173(4):1237-47. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2697-5. Epub 2013 Jun 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set.栖息地隔离对传粉者群落和结实率的影响。
Oecologia. 1999 Nov;121(3):432-440. doi: 10.1007/s004420050949.
2
Migration of moth species in a network of small islands.蛾类物种在一个小岛屿网络中的迁徙。
Oecologia. 1996 Dec;108(4):643-651. doi: 10.1007/BF00329038.
3
Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach.碎片化森林中的昆虫:功能方法。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 Jun;11(6):255-60. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(96)20047-3.
4
Scale dependence of immigration rates: models, metrics and data.移民率的尺度依赖性:模型、指标与数据。
J Anim Ecol. 2007 Jan;76(1):30-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01174.x.
5
Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation.物种对栖息地破碎化反应检测中的混杂因素。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006 Feb;81(1):117-42. doi: 10.1017/S1464793105006949. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
6
Local species immigration, extinction, and turnover of butterflies in relation to habitat area and habitat isolation.当地蝴蝶物种的迁入、灭绝及更替与栖息地面积和栖息地隔离的关系。
Oecologia. 2003 Dec;137(4):591-602. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1353-x. Epub 2003 Sep 23.
7
Mechanisms of animal navigation in odor plumes.动物在气味羽流中的导航机制。
Biol Bull. 2000 Apr;198(2):203-12. doi: 10.2307/1542524.
8
Nocturnality and species survival.夜行性与物种生存。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Oct 15;93(21):11709-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11709.
9
The analysis of olfactory communication among animals.动物间嗅觉交流的分析。
J Theor Biol. 1963 Nov;5(3):443-69. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(63)90089-4.

在一项跨大陆比较中,栖息地专业化、体型和科属特征解释了鳞翅目昆虫的密度-面积关系。

Habitat specialization, body size, and family identity explain lepidopteran density-area relationships in a cross-continental comparison.

作者信息

Hambäck Peter A, Summerville Keith S, Steffan-Dewenter Ingolf, Krauss Jochen, Englund Göran, Crist Thomas O

机构信息

Department of Botany, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 15;104(20):8368-73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611462104. Epub 2007 May 7.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.0611462104
PMID:17485669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1895956/
Abstract

Habitat fragmentation may strongly affect species density, species interactions, and the rate of ecosystem processes. It is therefore important to understand the observed variability among species responses to fragmentation and the underlying mechanisms. In this study, we compare density-area relationships (DARs) for 344 lepidopteran species belonging to 22 families (butterflies and moths). This analysis suggested that the DAR(slope) is generally positive for moths and negative for butterflies. The differences are suggested to occur because moths are largely olfactory searchers, whereas most butterflies are visual searchers. The analysis also suggests that DARs vary as a function of habitat specialization and body size. In butterflies, generalist species had a more negative DAR(slope) than specialist species because of a lower patch size threshold. In moths, the differences in DAR(slope) between forest and open habitat species were large for small species but absent for large species. This difference is argued to occur because the DAR(slope) in large species mainly reflects their search mode, which does not necessarily vary between moth groups, whereas the slope in small species reflects population growth rates.

摘要

栖息地破碎化可能会强烈影响物种密度、物种间相互作用以及生态系统过程的速率。因此,了解观察到的物种对破碎化反应的变异性及其潜在机制非常重要。在本研究中,我们比较了隶属于22个科(蝴蝶和蛾类)的344种鳞翅目物种的密度-面积关系(DARs)。该分析表明,蛾类的DAR(斜率)通常为正,而蝴蝶的为负。这些差异被认为是由于蛾类主要通过嗅觉搜索,而大多数蝴蝶是视觉搜索者。该分析还表明,DARs会因栖息地专业化程度和体型大小而有所不同。在蝴蝶中,广布种的DAR(斜率)比特有种更负,这是因为其斑块大小阈值更低。在蛾类中,小型物种的森林栖息地物种和开阔栖息地物种之间的DAR(斜率)差异很大,而大型物种则没有差异。这种差异被认为是由于大型物种的DAR(斜率)主要反映其搜索模式,而这种模式在蛾类群体之间不一定会有所不同,而小型物种的斜率则反映种群增长率。