da Cruz Marly Marques, dos Santos Elizabeth Moreira, Monteiro Simone
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Cad Saude Publica. 2007 May;23(5):995-1003. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2007000500002.
The article presents a review of approaches and methodologies in the evaluation of STD/AIDS prevention programs, searching for theoretical and methodological support for the institutionalization of evaluation and decision-making. The review included the MEDLINE, SciELO, and ISI Web of Science databases and other sources like textbooks and congress abstracts from 1990 to 2005, with the key words: "evaluation", "programs", "prevention", "STD/AIDS", and similar terms. The papers showed a predominance of quantitative outcome or impact evaluative studies with an experimental or quasi-experimental design. The main use of evaluation is accountability, although knowledge output and program improvement were also identified in the studies. Only a few evaluative studies contemplate process evaluation and its relationship to the contexts. The review aimed to contribute to the debate on STD/AIDS, which requires more effective, consistent, and sustainable decisions in the field of prevention.
本文对性传播感染/艾滋病预防项目评估的方法和方法论进行了综述,旨在为评估的制度化和决策寻找理论和方法支持。该综述涵盖了1990年至2005年的MEDLINE、SciELO和ISI Web of Science数据库以及其他来源,如教科书和国会摘要,关键词为:“评估”、“项目”、“预防”、“性传播感染/艾滋病”及类似词汇。论文显示,以实验性或准实验性设计为主的定量结果或影响评估研究占主导地位。评估的主要用途是问责,尽管研究中也提到了知识产出和项目改进。只有少数评估研究考虑了过程评估及其与背景的关系。该综述旨在为性传播感染/艾滋病领域的辩论做出贡献,该领域在预防方面需要更有效、一致和可持续的决策。