Stevens Catherine, Walker Gary, Boyer Morten, Gallagher Melinda
MARCS Auditory Laboratories, University of Western Sydney, Australia.
Int J Audiol. 2007 May;46(5):208-16. doi: 10.1080/14992020601102329.
The effect of chronic, severe tinnitus on two visual tasks was investigated. A general depletion of resources hypothesis states that overall performance would be impaired in a tinnitus group relative to a control group whereas a controlled processing hypothesis states that only tasks that are demanding, requiring strategic processes, are affected. Eleven participants who had experienced severe tinnitus for more than two years comprised the tinnitus group. A control group was matched for age and verbal IQ. Levels of anxiety, depression, and high frequency average hearing level were treated as covariates. Tasks consisted of the say-word (easy) and say-color (demanding) conditions of the Stroop task, a single (baseline) reaction time (RT) task, and dual tasks involving word reading or category naming while performing a concurrent RT task. Results supported the general depletion of resources hypothesis: RT of the tinnitus group was slower in both conditions of the Stroop task, and in the word reading and category naming conditions of the dual task. Differences were not attributable to high frequency average hearing level, anxiety, or depression.
研究了慢性重度耳鸣对两项视觉任务的影响。资源普遍耗竭假说认为,与对照组相比,耳鸣组的整体表现会受损;而受控加工假说则认为,只有那些需要策略性加工的高要求任务才会受到影响。11名经历重度耳鸣超过两年的参与者组成了耳鸣组。对照组在年龄和言语智商方面与之匹配。将焦虑、抑郁水平和高频平均听力水平作为协变量。任务包括Stroop任务的说出单词(容易)和说出颜色(高要求)条件、单一(基线)反应时(RT)任务,以及在执行并发RT任务时涉及单词阅读或类别命名的双重任务。结果支持资源普遍耗竭假说:耳鸣组在Stroop任务的两种条件下以及双重任务的单词阅读和类别命名条件下的反应时都较慢。差异并非归因于高频平均听力水平、焦虑或抑郁。