Steven Alison, Dickinson Claire, Pearson Pauline
School of Medical Education Development, The Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
J Interprof Care. 2007 Jun;21(3):251-64. doi: 10.1080/13561820701243664.
This paper reports on part of the evaluation of "The Common Learning Programme in the North East", which offered practice-based interprofessional education (IPE) to pre-qualification students. A realistic evaluation approach was used and data collection methods included interviews and observations in an attempt to look into "the black box" of practice-based IPE. The contexts of the sessions covered a number of clinical settings and involved a range of participants. Mechanisms included the content of the sessions and the procedures involved. Findings illustrate the complex and unpredictable ways in which discussions arise and evolve during IPE sessions and how interplay exists both between the contexts and the mechanisms, and between knowledge types. Issues are raised regarding the facilitation of IPE and the influence of the current evidence-based movement on research types. This study highlights the complexity and unpredictability of practice-based IPE and the usefulness of research approaches that look into the black box of educational practice.
本文报道了对“东北共同学习项目”部分评估的情况,该项目为资格前学生提供基于实践的跨专业教育(IPE)。采用了一种现实评估方法,数据收集方法包括访谈和观察,试图探究基于实践的IPE的“黑匣子”。课程背景涵盖了多个临床环境,涉及一系列参与者。机制包括课程内容和相关程序。研究结果表明,在IPE课程中讨论产生和发展的方式复杂且不可预测,以及背景与机制之间、知识类型之间如何相互作用。文中还提出了关于IPE促进以及当前循证运动对研究类型影响的问题。本研究强调了基于实践的IPE的复杂性和不可预测性,以及探究教育实践“黑匣子”的研究方法的实用性。