Arevalo Jorge, Ramirez Luis, Adaui Vanessa, Zimic Mirko, Tulliano Gianfranco, Miranda-Verástegui César, Lazo Marcela, Loayza-Muro Raúl, De Doncker Simonne, Maurer Anne, Chappuis Francois, Dujardin Jean-Claude, Llanos-Cuentas Alejandro
Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru, and Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Department of Community Medicine, Switzerland.
J Infect Dis. 2007 Jun 15;195(12):1846-51. doi: 10.1086/518041. Epub 2007 May 3.
Pentavalent antimonials (SbV) are the first-line chemotherapy for American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL). There are, however, reports of the occurrence of treatment failure with these drugs. Few studies in Latin America have compared the response to SbV treatment in ATL caused by different Leishmania species.
Clinical parameters and response to SbV chemotherapy were studied in 103 patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Peru. Leishmania isolates were collected before treatment and typed by multilocus polymerase-chain-reaction restriction fragment-length polymorphism analysis.
The 103 isolates were identified as L. (Viannia) peruviana (47.6%), L. (V.) guyanensis (23.3%), L. (V.) braziliensis (22.3%), L. (V.) lainsoni (4.9%), L. (Leishmania) mexicana (1%), and a putative hybrid, L. (V.) braziliensis/L. (V.) peruviana (1%). L. (V.) guyanensis was most abundant in central Peru. Of patients infected with the 3 former species, 21 (21.9%) did not respond to SbV chemotherapy. The proportions of treatment failure (after 12 months of follow-up) were 30.4%, 24.5%, and 8.3% in patients infected with L. (V.) braziliensis, L. (V.) peruviana, and L. (V.) guyanensis, respectively. Infection with L. (V.) guyanensis was associated with significantly less treatment failure than L. (V.) braziliensis, as determined by multiple logistic regression analysis (odds ratio, 0.07 [95% confidence interval, 0.007-0.8]; P=.03).
Leishmania species can influence SbV treatment outcome in patients with CL. Therefore, parasite identification is of utmost clinical importance, because it should lead to a species-oriented treatment.
五价锑剂是美洲皮肤利什曼病(ATL)的一线化疗药物。然而,有报道称使用这些药物会出现治疗失败的情况。在拉丁美洲,很少有研究比较不同利什曼原虫物种引起的ATL对锑剂治疗的反应。
对秘鲁103例皮肤利什曼病(CL)患者的临床参数和对锑剂化疗的反应进行了研究。在治疗前收集利什曼原虫分离株,并通过多位点聚合酶链反应-限制性片段长度多态性分析进行分型。
103株分离株被鉴定为秘鲁利什曼原虫(Viannia亚属)(47.6%)、圭亚那利什曼原虫(V.亚属)(23.3%)、巴西利什曼原虫(V.亚属)(22.3%)、赖氏利什曼原虫(V.亚属)(4.9%)、墨西哥利什曼原虫(Leishmania亚属)(1%),以及一种推定的杂交种,巴西利什曼原虫(V.亚属)/秘鲁利什曼原虫(V.亚属)(1%)。圭亚那利什曼原虫(V.亚属)在秘鲁中部最为常见。在感染前三种利什曼原虫的患者中,21例(21.9%)对锑剂化疗无反应。在感染巴西利什曼原虫(V.亚属)、秘鲁利什曼原虫(V.亚属)和圭亚那利什曼原虫(V.亚属)的患者中,随访12个月后的治疗失败率分别为30.4%、24.5%和8.3%。通过多因素逻辑回归分析确定,感染圭亚那利什曼原虫(V.亚属)的患者治疗失败率明显低于感染巴西利什曼原虫(V.亚属)的患者(比值比,0.07[95%置信区间,0.007-0.8];P=0.03)。
利什曼原虫物种可影响CL患者的锑剂治疗结果。因此,寄生虫鉴定具有至关重要的临床意义,因为它应能指导进行针对性的物种治疗。