Patrick Christopher J, Hicks Brian M, Nichol Penny E, Krueger Robert F
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
J Pers Disord. 2007 Apr;21(2):118-41. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2007.21.2.118.
To date, models of the structure of psychopathy as assessed by the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) have taken a higher-order approach in which the factors of the PCL-R are modeled as correlated elements of a higher-order psychopathy construct. Here, we propose an alternative structural model of the PCL-R, the bifactor model, which accounts for the covariance among PCL-R items in terms of a general factor reflecting the overlap across all items, and independent subfactors reflecting the unique coherency among particular groups of items. We present examples of how this alternative structural model can account for diverging associations between different subsets of PCL-R items and external criteria in the domains of personality and psychopathology, and we discuss implications of the bifactor model for future research on the conceptualization and assessment of psychopathy.
迄今为止,通过《精神病态核查表修订版》(PCL-R)评估的精神病态结构模型采用了一种高阶方法,即将PCL-R的各因素建模为一个高阶精神病态结构的相关要素。在此,我们提出PCL-R的另一种结构模型——双因素模型,该模型根据一个反映所有项目重叠情况的一般因素以及反映特定项目组之间独特一致性的独立子因素来解释PCL-R项目之间的协方差。我们举例说明了这种替代结构模型如何解释PCL-R项目的不同子集与人格和精神病理学领域的外部标准之间的不同关联,并讨论了双因素模型对未来精神病态概念化和评估研究的影响。