• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床试验中的人群问题。

Population issues in clinical trials.

作者信息

Mosenifar Zab

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90049, USA.

出版信息

Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007 May;4(2):185-7; discussion 187-8. doi: 10.1513/pats.200701-009GC.

DOI:10.1513/pats.200701-009GC
PMID:17494729
Abstract

Inclusion of underrepresented groups in clinical trials is important for several reasons. Age, sex, race, genetic factors, concomitant use of other medications, and comorbid conditions all may play pivotal roles in response to a drug or intervention. Despite the legislation for broader inclusion of underrepresented groups in clinical trials (via the National Institutes of Health [NIH] Revitalization Act of 1993), underrepresentation of particular populations, particularly minorities, continues to be a problem. Studies of predictors of clinical trial enrollment suggest that most people participate in clinical research to find relief from a disease, not for financial remuneration. Yet, men and whites are more likely to enroll in studies and some data indicate that certain patient populations are preferentially (albeit sometimes inadvertently) chosen for study enrollment. This tendency toward inclusion stems from human nature-the natural tendency for an investigator to relate to a particular investigative topic due to a special connection based on a cultural, socioeconomic, age, ethnicity, or gender level. This article reviews the most common population issues for clinical studies: age, gender, race, socioeconomic status, comorbidities, and disease severity, with examples of each from published studies. Recommendations are also offered to overcome these barriers.

摘要

将代表性不足的群体纳入临床试验很重要,原因有几个。年龄、性别、种族、遗传因素、其他药物的同时使用以及合并症在对药物或干预措施的反应中都可能起关键作用。尽管有立法要求在临床试验中更广泛地纳入代表性不足的群体(通过1993年的美国国立卫生研究院[NIH]振兴法案),但特定人群,尤其是少数群体的代表性不足仍然是一个问题。对临床试验入组预测因素的研究表明,大多数人参与临床研究是为了缓解疾病,而非为了经济报酬。然而,男性和白人更有可能参与研究,一些数据表明某些患者群体被优先(尽管有时是无意地)选为研究对象。这种纳入倾向源于人性——由于基于文化、社会经济、年龄、种族或性别层面的特殊联系,研究者自然倾向于与特定的研究主题产生关联。本文回顾了临床研究中最常见的人群问题:年龄、性别、种族、社会经济地位、合并症和疾病严重程度,并列举了已发表研究中的相关示例。还提出了克服这些障碍的建议。

相似文献

1
Population issues in clinical trials.临床试验中的人群问题。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007 May;4(2):185-7; discussion 187-8. doi: 10.1513/pats.200701-009GC.
2
Twenty years post-NIH Revitalization Act: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual: renewing the case for enhancing minority participation in cancer clinical trials.NIH 复兴法案颁布 20 年后:增强少数族裔参与临床试验(EMPaCT):为改善少数族裔临床试验入组奠定基础:重申增强少数族裔参与癌症临床试验的必要性。
Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120 Suppl 7(0 7):1091-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28575.
3
The inclusion of women and minorities in smoking cessation clinical trials: a systematic review.戒烟临床试验中女性和少数族裔的纳入情况:一项系统综述。
Am J Addict. 2009 Jan-Feb;18(1):21-8. doi: 10.1080/10550490802408522.
4
Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities.参与癌症临床试验:基于种族、性别和年龄的差异。
JAMA. 2004 Jun 9;291(22):2720-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.22.2720.
5
Minority Representation in Migraine Treatment Trials.偏头痛治疗试验中的少数群体代表性
Headache. 2017 Mar;57(3):525-533. doi: 10.1111/head.13018. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
6
Involving South Asian patients in clinical trials.让南亚患者参与临床试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Oct;8(42):iii, 1-109. doi: 10.3310/hta8420.
7
Minority Enrollment to Clinical Trials: Road to Increased Access.少数民族参与临床试验:增加可及性的途径。
Oncology (Williston Park). 2021 Mar 15;35(3):107. doi: 10.46883/ONC.2021.3503.0107.
8
The generalizability of NCI-sponsored clinical trials accrual among women with gynecologic malignancies.美国国立癌症研究所资助的妇科恶性肿瘤女性临床试验入组情况的可推广性。
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Dec;143(3):611-616. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.09.026. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
9
Inclusion of black Americans in oncology clinical trials: the Louisiana State University Medical Center experience.美国黑人参与肿瘤学临床试验:路易斯安那州立大学医学中心的经验。
Am J Clin Oncol. 1999 Feb;22(1):18-21. doi: 10.1097/00000421-199902000-00005.
10
Recruiting intergenerational African American males for biomedical research Studies: a major research challenge.招募非裔美国男性跨代参与生物医学研究:一项重大研究挑战。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Jun;103(6):480-7. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30361-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The Permissibility of Biased AI in a Biased World: An Ethical Analysis of AI for Screening and Referrals for Diabetic Retinopathy in Singapore.在存在偏见的世界中,有偏见的人工智能的可容许性:对新加坡糖尿病视网膜病变筛查和转诊人工智能的伦理分析
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2024 Oct 31;17(1):167-185. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00315-3. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Parkinson Disease Genetics Extended to African and Hispanic Ancestries in the VA Million Veteran Program.帕金森病遗传学在退伍军人事务部百万退伍军人计划中扩展至非洲和西班牙裔血统人群。
Neurol Genet. 2023 Dec 20;10(1):e200110. doi: 10.1212/NXG.0000000000200110. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Clozapine and neutrophil response in patients of African descent: A six-month, multinational, prospective, open-label clinical trial.
氯氮平和非洲裔患者的中性粒细胞反应:一项为期六个月、多国、前瞻性、开放性临床试验。
Schizophr Res. 2024 Jun;268:312-322. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.08.002. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
4
Machine Learning in Clinical Trials: A Primer with Applications to Neurology.临床试验中的机器学习:应用于神经病学的入门指南。
Neurotherapeutics. 2023 Jul;20(4):1066-1080. doi: 10.1007/s13311-023-01384-2. Epub 2023 May 30.
5
Interpersonal Values of Patients Participating in Phase II-III Clinical Trials: Implications for Clinical Trial Representativeness.参与II-III期临床试验患者的人际价值观:对临床试验代表性的影响。
Pharmaceut Med. 2023 Jul;37(4):319-329. doi: 10.1007/s40290-023-00479-7. Epub 2023 May 30.
6
Secondary analysis of electronic opt-out consent in pragmatic research: A study design method to diversify clinical trials?电子弃权同意的实用研究中的二次分析:一种使临床试验多样化的研究设计方法?
Am Heart J. 2023 Jul;261:104-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.03.010. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
7
Telephone and Smartphone-Based Interventions for Cognitive and Cardio-Metabolic Health in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Systematic Review.基于电话和智能手机的中老年人群认知和心脑血管代谢健康干预措施的系统评价。
Clin Interv Aging. 2022 Nov 10;17:1599-1624. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S352137. eCollection 2022.
8
Cardiovascular Safety Reporting in Contemporary Breast Cancer Clinical Trials.当代乳腺癌临床试验中的心血管安全性报告。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Aug 2;11(15):e025206. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.025206. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
9
A Review of Interventional Trials in Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: Challenges and Opportunities.青少年2型糖尿病干预试验综述:挑战与机遇
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Nov;12(11):2827-2856. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01136-5. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
10
Analysis of Population Differences in Digital Conversations About Cancer Clinical Trials: Advanced Data Mining and Extraction Study.癌症临床试验数字对话中的人群差异分析:高级数据挖掘与提取研究
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Sep 23;7(3):e25621. doi: 10.2196/25621.