Suppr超能文献

偏头痛治疗试验中的少数群体代表性

Minority Representation in Migraine Treatment Trials.

作者信息

Robbins Nathaniel M, Bernat James L

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.

出版信息

Headache. 2017 Mar;57(3):525-533. doi: 10.1111/head.13018. Epub 2017 Jan 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minorities have historically been underrepresented in clinical research trials despite having comparatively poor health indicators. Recognizing the dual inequalities of increased disease burden and decreased research participation, the National Institute of Health (NIH) Revitalization Act of 1993 mandated the inclusion and reporting of women and minorities in NIH-funded research. While progress has been made in the subsequent decades, this underrepresentation of minorities in research trials persists and has been documented in multiple disciplines. However, the extent of adequate representation and reporting of minority inclusion in clinical trials for migraine remains unknown.

OBJECTIVES

In this systematic review and study, we review the literature examining the representation of women and minorities in migraine clinical research trials METHODS: First we searched PubMed for pertinent articles examining the inclusion of women and minorities in migraine clinical research trials. Second, we identified controlled-trials for migraine published since 2011 in major neurology, headache, and general medicine journals using the terms "migraine randomized controlled trial." We then reviewed the results manually and excluded pilot studies and those with fewer than 50 participants. We next determined (a) how frequently representation of minorities and women were reported in these major trials; (b) what factors correlated with reporting; and (c) whether women and minority inclusion comprised their ratios in the general population.

RESULTS

We identified 128 relevant clinical trials, of which 36 met our inclusion criteria. All 36 trials (100%) reported gender frequency, and 25 of 36 (69.4%) reported ethnicity or race. Among all studies, women and Whites represented 84.2 and 82.9% of participants (mean), respectively. Studies conducted in the United States and funded by a private company were more likely to report race than studies conducted exclusively outside of the U.S. or with a public sponsor. No studies stratified efficacy or safety by ethnicity or gender. Men and non-Whites in the U.S. were statistically underrepresented.

CONCLUSIONS

Most recent headache studies comply with the NIH mandate to include women and minorities in research trials, particularly U.S.-based and industry-funded studies. Whites are overrepresented compared to both the general population and the population of migraineurs. Future studies should strive to increase minority participation and investigate race-based differences in migraine expression, treatment response, and medication toxicity.

摘要

背景

尽管少数族裔的健康指标相对较差,但在临床研究试验中,他们的参与度历来较低。认识到疾病负担增加和研究参与度降低这一双重不平等现象,美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)1993年的《振兴法案》规定在由NIH资助的研究中纳入并报告女性和少数族裔。在随后的几十年里虽有进展,但少数族裔在研究试验中的代表性不足问题仍然存在,并且在多个学科领域都有记录。然而,偏头痛临床试验中少数族裔的充分代表性和报告程度仍然未知。

目的

在这项系统评价和研究中,我们回顾了关于偏头痛临床研究试验中女性和少数族裔代表性的文献。方法:首先,我们在PubMed上搜索了有关偏头痛临床研究试验中纳入女性和少数族裔的相关文章。其次,我们使用“偏头痛随机对照试验”一词,在主要的神经病学、头痛和普通医学期刊中识别自2011年以来发表的偏头痛对照试验。然后我们人工审查结果,排除试点研究和参与者少于50人的研究。接下来,我们确定:(a)在这些主要试验中,少数族裔和女性的代表性报告频率如何;(b)与报告相关的因素有哪些;(c)女性和少数族裔的纳入是否构成了他们在普通人群中的比例。

结果

我们识别出128项相关临床试验,其中36项符合我们的纳入标准。所有36项试验(100%)都报告了性别频率,36项试验中的25项(69.4%)报告了种族或民族。在所有研究中,女性和白人分别占参与者的84.2%和82.9%(平均)。在美国进行且由私人公司资助的研究比仅在美国境外进行或由公共赞助商资助的研究更有可能报告种族。没有研究按种族或性别对疗效或安全性进行分层。美国的男性和非白人在统计学上代表性不足。

结论

最近的头痛研究符合NIH在研究试验中纳入女性和少数族裔的要求,特别是美国的研究和行业资助的研究。与普通人群和偏头痛患者群体相比,白人的代表性过高。未来的研究应努力增加少数族裔的参与度,并研究偏头痛表现、治疗反应和药物毒性方面基于种族的差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验