Usadi Rebecca S, Marshburn Paul B
Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina 28232-2861, USA.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;19(3):279-83. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3281099659.
Uterine artery embolization for management of symptomatic fibroids is an effective and increasingly popular treatment option. There are several studies evaluating the effects of uterine artery embolization on later pregnancies; however, the effects on fertility are still largely uncertain. This paper reviews the current literature on the effects of this technique on fertility and pregnancy outcome.
Two recent studies have reported pregnancy rates following uterine artery embolization in women seeking pregnancy. A small, third study reported preliminary results in a randomized controlled trial comparing uterine artery embolization with myomectomy in women wishing to preserve fertility.
The body of medical literature supports use of uterine artery embolization as an effective treatment for symptoms of vaginal bleeding and pelvic pressure from uterine fibroids. Patient selection is critical in determining the appropriateness of this treatment option. Myomectomy remains the standard of care for women with symptomatic fibroids seeking fertility preservation.
子宫动脉栓塞术用于治疗有症状的子宫肌瘤是一种有效且越来越受欢迎的治疗选择。有多项研究评估了子宫动脉栓塞术对后续妊娠的影响;然而,其对生育能力的影响仍很大程度上不确定。本文综述了关于该技术对生育能力和妊娠结局影响的当前文献。
最近两项研究报告了有妊娠意愿女性接受子宫动脉栓塞术后的妊娠率。第三项小型研究报告了一项随机对照试验的初步结果,该试验比较了子宫动脉栓塞术与肌瘤切除术对希望保留生育能力女性的效果。
医学文献支持将子宫动脉栓塞术作为治疗子宫肌瘤引起的阴道出血和盆腔压迫症状的有效方法。患者选择对于确定该治疗方案的适用性至关重要。肌瘤切除术仍然是有症状且希望保留生育能力的子宫肌瘤女性的标准治疗方法。