文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

射频频段中用于限制暴露的不同量之间的剂量学比较:原理及对指南的影响

Dosimetric comparison between different quantities for limiting exposure in the RF band: rationale and implications for guidelines.

作者信息

Lin James C

机构信息

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60607-7053, USA.

出版信息

Health Phys. 2007 Jun;92(6):547-53. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000236788.33488.65.


DOI:10.1097/01.HP.0000236788.33488.65
PMID:17495655
Abstract

While source type and its distance from the subject are influential parameters, the fundamental exposure metrics are the physically measurable quantities of currents, external electric field and magnetic field strengths, and incident power density (when appropriate), which induce electric and magnetic fields that bring about the interaction of radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic energy with biological systems. Induced fields are the primary cause for biological effect of RF exposure, regardless of the mechanism. Thus, in order to achieve a quantitative understanding of biological response, the induced electric field and the derived dosimetric quantities of specific absorption rate (SAR) and current density must be quantified and correlated with the observed phenomenon. In the established exposure guidelines, reference levels expressed in terms of physical quantities are introduced for practical exposure assessment purposes since the basic restrictions are often specified as dosimetric quantities that may be impractical to measure. The dosimetric quantity SAR, current density, and their determinations are tissue-type dependent and require a region of specific tissue mass for averaging. Thus, a smaller averaging region is scientifically more relevant and precise. It is emphasized that the sensitivity and resolution of present-day computational resources and experimental measurement techniques can provide accurate SAR values with a spatial resolution on the order of a 1 mm, in dimensions. Furthermore, most exposure guidelines are promulgated on a 4 W kg SAR to prevent any whole-body exposure from raising the body temperature to 1 degrees C above the norm at 37 degrees C. Special guidance may be needed for higher ambient temperature and humidity variations.

摘要

虽然源类型及其与受检者的距离是有影响的参数,但基本的暴露指标是电流、外部电场和磁场强度以及入射功率密度(如适用)等可物理测量的量,这些量会感应出电场和磁场,从而导致射频(RF)电磁能与生物系统相互作用。无论其机制如何,感应场都是射频暴露产生生物效应的主要原因。因此,为了定量了解生物反应,必须对感应电场以及比吸收率(SAR)和电流密度等导出的剂量学量进行量化,并将其与观察到的现象相关联。在既定的暴露指南中,出于实际暴露评估目的,引入了以物理量表示的参考水平,因为基本限制通常规定为剂量学量,而这些量可能难以测量。剂量学量SAR、电流密度及其测定取决于组织类型,并且需要特定组织质量的区域进行平均。因此,较小的平均区域在科学上更具相关性和精确性。需要强调的是,当今计算资源和实验测量技术的灵敏度和分辨率能够提供空间分辨率在毫米量级的准确SAR值。此外,大多数暴露指南是基于4 W/kg的SAR制定的,以防止任何全身暴露使体温在37℃的正常水平之上升高1℃。对于更高的环境温度和湿度变化,可能需要特殊指导。

相似文献

[1]
Dosimetric comparison between different quantities for limiting exposure in the RF band: rationale and implications for guidelines.

Health Phys. 2007-6

[2]
Numerical dosimetry ELF: accuracy of the method, variability of models and parameters, and the implication for quantifying guidelines.

Health Phys. 2007-6

[3]
Different basic dosimetric quantities for the characterization of exposure to low-frequency electric and magnetic fields and the implication for practical exposure conditions and guidelines.

Health Phys. 2007-6

[4]
Requirements for reliable worst-case assessment of human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields with known uncertainty.

Health Phys. 2007-6

[5]
Implications of clinical RF hyperthermia on protection limits in the RF range.

Health Phys. 2007-6

[6]
Thermal mechanisms of interaction of radiofrequency energy with biological systems with relevance to exposure guidelines.

Health Phys. 2007-6

[7]
Demodulation in tissue, the relevant parameters and the implications for limiting exposure.

Health Phys. 2007-6

[8]
Assessment of complex EMF exposure situations including inhomogeneous field distribution.

Health Phys. 2007-6

[9]
A comparison of important international and national standards for limiting exposure to EMF including the scientific rationale.

Health Phys. 2007-6

[10]
Rapporteur Report: ICNIRP international workshop on EMF dosimetry and biophysical aspects relevant to setting exposure guidelines.

Health Phys. 2007-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索