Loch-Wilkinson Thorbjorn J, Stalberg Peter L H, Sidhu Stan B, Sywak Mark S, Wilkinson James F, Delbridge Leigh W
University of Sydney, Endocrine Surgical Unit, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2007 May;77(5):377-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04065.x.
Monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) has been claimed in some studies to reduce rates of nerve injury during thyroid surgery compared with anatomical dissection and visual identification of the RLN alone, whereas other studies have found no benefit. Continuous monitoring with endotracheal electrodes is expensive whereas discontinuous monitoring by laryngeal palpation with nerve stimulation is a simple and inexpensive technique. This study aimed to assess the value of nerve stimulation with laryngeal palpation as a means of identifying and assessing the function of the RLN and external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN) during thyroid surgery.
This was a prospective case series comprising 50 consecutive patients undergoing total thyroidectomy providing 100 RLN and 100 EBSLN for examination. All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative vocal cord and voice assessment by an independent ear, nose and throat surgeon, laryngeal examination at extubation and all were asked to complete a postoperative dysphagia score sheet. Dysphagia scores in the study group were compared with a control group (n = 20) undergoing total thyroidectomy without nerve stimulation.
One hundred of 100 (100%) RLN were located without the use of the nerve stimulator. A negative twitch response occurred in seven (7%) RLN stimulated (two bilateral, three unilateral). Postoperative testing, however, only showed one true unilateral RLN palsy postoperatively (1%), which recovered in 7 weeks giving six false-positive and one true-positive results. Eighty-six of 100 (86%) EBSLN were located without the nerve stimulator. Thirteen of 100 (13%) EBSLN could not be identified and 1 of 100 (1%) was located with the use of the nerve stimulator. Fourteen per cent of EBSLN showed no cricothyroid twitch on EBSLN stimulation. Postoperative vocal function in these patients was normal. There were no instances of equipment malfunction. Dysphagia scores did not differ significantly between the study and control groups.
Use of a nerve stimulator did not aid in anatomical dissection of the RLN and was useful in identifying only one EBSLN. Discontinuous nerve monitoring by stimulation during total thyroidectomy confers no obvious benefit for the experienced surgeon in nerve identification, functional testing or injury prevention.
一些研究称,与单纯依靠解剖分离和视觉识别喉返神经(RLN)相比,在甲状腺手术中监测RLN可降低神经损伤发生率,而其他研究则未发现其有益之处。气管内电极连续监测成本高昂,而通过喉部触诊加神经刺激进行间断监测是一种简单且成本低廉的技术。本研究旨在评估喉部触诊神经刺激作为在甲状腺手术中识别和评估RLN及喉上神经外支(EBSLN)功能的一种手段的价值。
这是一项前瞻性病例系列研究,纳入了连续50例行甲状腺全切除术的患者,共提供100条RLN和100条EBSLN用于检查。所有患者术前和术后均由独立的耳鼻喉科医生进行声带和嗓音评估,拔管时进行喉部检查,所有患者均被要求填写术后吞咽困难评分表。将研究组的吞咽困难评分与未进行神经刺激的甲状腺全切除术对照组(n = 20)进行比较。
100条RLN中有100条(100%)未使用神经刺激器就得以定位。在接受刺激的100条RLN中有7条(7%)出现阴性抽搐反应(2条双侧,3条单侧)。然而,术后检测仅显示术后有1例真正的单侧RLN麻痹(1%),该患者在7周后恢复,出现6例假阳性和1例真阳性结果。100条EBSLN中有86条(86%)未使用神经刺激器就得以定位。100条EBSLN中有13条(13%)无法识别,1条(1%)借助神经刺激器得以定位。14%的EBSLN在刺激时未出现环甲肌抽搐。这些患者术后嗓音功能正常。未出现设备故障情况。研究组和对照组的吞咽困难评分无显著差异。
使用神经刺激器对RLN的解剖分离并无帮助,仅对识别1条EBSLN有用。在甲状腺全切除术中通过刺激进行间断神经监测,对于经验丰富的外科医生在神经识别、功能测试或预防损伤方面并无明显益处。